The AM radio host is trying to make the case that 'ground-level' commanders don't like Obozo's decision to withdraw troops.
Should we review the Constitution? The term "commander-in-chief" is derived from the President's authority over 'ground-level commanders.'
So. Tell us why US troops--at 100,000+ member levels--should remain in The 'Stan.
What's the objective? Eliminate the Taliban? Create civilization?
You have 500 years?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
The troops on the ground may have their say, but in the end, it is civilian authority that tells them what to do. I don't particularly care for this C-I-C, but it is what it is.
AM radio host sounds like a symbiotic condition.
So do the big three broadcasters. What's your point?
Post a Comment