Discussion of a new sex-ed bill before the Legislature. Same s*&^, different day--the (D) sponsors want to de-emphasize abstinence. (Surprise!!)
But there's more:
Rhonda Thompson, a Middleton mom of five and community relations director at Care Net Pregnancy Center of Dane County, says the law would limit parents' ability to know what is being taught.
"They're restricting access by eliminating the words 'all' and 'at any time,' meaning that parents and community members could only see the curriculum before they begin teaching it," Thompson says. "That change of policy and lack of transparency is disrespectful of parents."
There's no good reason to eliminate parental oversight, especially given the demi-polymorphous-pervert "School Safety" czar installed by Obamamamamamama.
HT: FoxPolitics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
"There's no good reason to eliminate parental oversight, especially given the demi-polymorphous-pervert "School Safety" czar installed by Obamamamamamama."
Yeah no reason at all. Especially not parents who think the President is attempting to brainwash our youth with communist propaganda. I'm sure they'll be rational the first time they remotely object to a portion of the cirriculum being taught.
Post a Comment