No problem.
Just assemble several hundred actual Americans.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Wisconsin native. "The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him."--GKC "Liberalism is the modern and morbid habit of always sacrificing the normal to the abnormal" --G K Chesterton "The only objective of Liberty is Life" --G K Chesterton "A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition." -- Rudyard Kipling
About Me
- Dad29
- SUPER-STRAIGHT. Old. Nasty. Likes Chesterton, Gregorian Chant and other real music. Calvin & Hobbes is Great!. Varmint-shooter, and have trained ALL my children in the art.
Fr. Harry
Followers
Gadsden
Don't Tread on Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(3131)
-
▼
May
(192)
- Obozo's Commerce Pick: Bad News (You Were Expecti...
- Magister Firing Pea-Shooter at Benedict XVI
- The Short Take on Liturgical Music
- Just a Coincidence? Or More?
- Lest You Forget
- Think Folkbum Can Beat This?
- High-Profile Anthony? Not For Long
- Is This Misleading, or Ignorance, or Propaganda?
- Memorial Day
- C S Lewis on Latin and Chant
- Another Reason to Leave Illinois
- Benedict XVI, "The Hammer"?
- Pitcher? Yah, And Crooner, Too
- RomneyCare and CornAHole, Too!
- Agenda Item for Wisconsin Leggies
- Back Again: BATF's Illegal Records Request
- RoJo Meets and Dislikes Fourth Amendment
- "Catholic Professors"? Or Just Hacks?
- Poles Are Tough
- The Effective Alinsky-ite (Hint: Obama's the Name)
- Can't Sit Still? Obozo'll Spend $500 Mill to Fix ...
- Milk-Carton Tommy Poses for Holy Cards
- Wacko Shooter Wannabee....
- It's Funny, No Matter Who You Like
- Geithner: Can't Do TurboTax, Can't See, Either
- EEEEEvil County Board Reichstag!
- Sell Bunnies, Get Lost in Mountains, Sell Yogurt...
- Habemus Episcopum!
- Sumi Does What's Expected
- Gun Control by Other Means
- It Ain't the Act. It's the Interpretation of the ...
- Death's Door in Joplin
- Suppose YOU Got to Drive an F50 Ferrari?
- Some Ideas Are Just Plain Dumb, Rep. Klenke
- Walker Forfeits $30 Million to State's Union Emplo...
- Insider Traders: the Ruling Class
- The Best Budget Plan? Not Ryan's (!!)
- Bi-Partisan!!
- "Best, Brightest"--and Facing a Grand Jury
- Consider Yourself Warned if You Live in Georgetown
- The Guerena Affair
- How ObozoCare Defines "Family"
- The Dance of Liturgy
- J T Thomas (Bears...): Classy Big Guy
- Yup. You're Just Plain DUMBER!
- Is T-Paw Just Another Big Gummint "Conservative"?
- TOTUS MIA, SNAFU Ensues
- Sniper-Threat to Obama? Probably Not
- The T Boone Subsidy
- ObamaCare Screenings: Really Important, But Fugge...
- New Traffic Controls in Brookfield
- Milwaukee Company Makes National News
- Chrysler "Pays Back" TARP?
- Stop Worrying About Obama!
- Offshoring in PRChina? Better Read This!
- First Person Report: Joplin
- On Rove, K-Hammer, and Cain
- The Mortgage-Lenders' Kitchens Get Hotter
- Vote Fraud? Yup.
- "Constitutional"? "Permit-Only"? It's the Training!
- Election Politics? Or Common Sense?
- "Jobs Council" Members Like Jobs---Overseas
- P-Mac Has It Right
- Pawlenty To Corn-A-Holers: It's Going to End
- Going to Prom? TSA'll Grope You There!
- Who's Agitating in Madison?
- Lean Days for Banks Ahead?
- Sheriff Dupnik Makes the News Again
- Paul Ryan Eats Davey-Boy Gregory for Lunch
- Pawlenty To Corn-A-Hole Nationally!
- The Next "Kinetic Military But Definitely Not-War ...
- The Ruling Class
- Recovery, Sorta
- Indiana v. US 4th Amendment
- Yes, The Rapture Happened!
- The Obozo Campaign's Troubles
- The "Catholic Professors'" Alternative Plan for Me...
- Prosser Wins. Game Over?
- Fence, No Moat, No Alligators
- Vote Fraud? Another Name for Sykes!
- "The Law? I Don't NEED Your Stinkin' Law"--B. Hus...
- That Sulfur Smell? It's Duke Energy
- Evil And Dangerous To The Republic. Obama? Nope....
- That "Catholic Professor" Letter to Boehner?
- Yesterday's Anniversary
- Bad Singing, Good Fun
- EPA Rules. IBEW, UMW Hardest Hit (!!)
- Medicare? It's Zombie
- Both Parties Agree, So Red Flags Are Flying
- Bernardin-From-the-Grave?
- The Abolition of the Rule of Law
- Coming Soon to Madistan
- Goodwin Liu Smacked Down, Again!
- Kansas: No Longer Bloody
- On Dying Married
- "Religion-Less" Country?
- Need a Little DOOM?
- A Few Notes About Travel
- ObozoLies, "Unemployment" Chapter
- Hey, Tim! It's the SPENDING!
-
▼
May
(192)
Links
- American Economic Alert
- Boots and Sabers
- Catholic Caveman
- Catholic World News Opinion
- Chesterton & Friends
- Christus Vincit
- FreeRepublicLatestPosts
- Grim's Hall
- John Lott's Website
- Lakeshore Laments
- LawDog Files
- ManWithBlackHat
- Moonbattery
- New Liturgical Movement
- No Runny Eggs
- Other McCain
- Overlawyered
- Planet Moron
- Shark&Shepherd
- Sykes
- Terrence Berres
- The Curt Jester
- The Marquette Warrior
- The Onion: REAL News
- Vox Day
- What the Prayer REALLY Says
- Wigderson
28 comments:
I hope this starts spreading. Good for these young people.
Have a GREAT week.
"Actual Americans". HA!
Sorry, but flag burning is protected free speech, regardless of how you or I feel about it.
Marshall and Scalia, in the famous Texas vs. Johnson case (1989), your conservative Supreme Court idols, were in the majority. Apparently, these two justices are FAKE Americans, using your criteria. Tsk, tsk, tsk.
Yes, but the First Amendment protects only "good speech."
For "actual Americans."
"Good speech", Morrisey? Seriously, that's your argument.
George Hay, Virginian member of the House Of Delegates, in 1799 stated, "Freedom of speech means the power uncontrolled by law, of speaking either truth or falsehood at the discretion of each individual...A man may say everything which is passion can suggest; he may employ all his time and talents, if he is wicked enough to do so, in speaking against government matters, but he is sheltered...The power of controlling opinions has never yet been claimed, and no criteria has been established under law to make such a determination."
And two of the most conservative membersof the Supreme Court--literalists, mind you--within the past 60 years agree.
From the report I heard, the kid who was going to burn the flag decided not to. He went there to speak his piece, and was shouted down. Isn't that what some lefties do? Two wrongs and all that. I then heard one of the organizers of the counter protest on FOX say that the majority was right to shout down the kid and prevent him from speaking. That goes against what the 1st Amendment intended. It was intended so that the minority or contrary opinion and thought would be heard. Sadly, the counter protesters either don't understand this, or worse, don't believe in it. Burning the flag is, in my opinion, despicable. That said, if we start disallowing one form of speech, where does it end? Do we not become what we've railed against the left of?
So protesting is un-American, then?
There's protesting, then there's the habitual tantrums of socio-economic malingering that seems to be popular among the "socially-conscious" and "intellectual".
Most of the Leftist protesters' opposition are quietly working at their jobs, paying taxes, and raising their families. You know, doing grown-up things.
Or...
Most of the Leftist protesters' are [most of the time] quietly working at their jobs, paying taxes, and raising their families. You know, doing grown-up things.
No offense dad, I agree with Jim. Your post title is a little vague. It should have read: "How to Stop an Unshaven, Unwashed Douchebag Who Thinks It's Cool to Burn the American Flag."
Bravo Roland, Well Said!
Flag burning is constitutional, regardless of how you feel about it! In fact, conservative icons Scalia and Marshall, as originalists, voted with the majority in Texas v. Johnson (1990).
Justice Anthony Kennedy...
"For we are presented with a clear and simple statute to be judged against a pure command of the Constitution. The outcome can be laid at no door but ours. The hard fact is that sometimes we must make decisions we do not like. We make them because they are right, right in the sense that the law and the Constitution, as we see them, compel the result. And so great is our commitment to the process that, except in the rare case, we do not pause to express distaste for the result, perhaps for fear of undermining a valued principle that dictates the decision. This is one of those rare cases. *** Though symbols often are what we ourselves make of them, the flag is constant in expressing beliefs Americans share, beliefs in law and peace and that freedom which sustains the human spirit. The case here today forces recognition of the costs to which those beliefs commit us. It is poignant but fundamental that the flag protects those who hold it in contempt."
Well said, indeed!
Don't forget that if the protesters were conservative, these attackers would be "thugs".
I just went to John Fausts blog " boots and Kittens" and looked at the last 17 postings. Observations.
Nobody is making any comments. Not a single one.
I bet the only way he gets hits on his blog is by posting on other blogs as there was absolutely nothing of interest. Only the mindless rattling of an empty lefty mind. No wonder he frequents Dad29's website so frequently.
And that is supposed to prove what? That John's last comment here wasn't absolutely, positively spot on?
Nah.
It proves that nobody but Foust is interested in what Foust says.
Of course burning the flag is Constitutional. The maggot-infested plastic-banana good-time-rock-n-roll hippie should have burned it.
He has rights!
What? He peed his pants and got his matches wet?
The point of the post appeared to be NOT about the protester, but about those who "countered" the protest.
So call the protester a hippie if it makes you feel good or superior. (I'm sure you do not know the meaning of the term.) Doesn't matter. Foust is absolutely correct that if it had been a Tea Party protester being hassled, those doing the hassling would have been considered thugs by you.
Anony, B&K is a parody. It is static HTML. There is no way to comment. This is intentional.
If I were to ever parody Dad29, I would certainly use the phrase "plastic banana" quite often. Can anyone tell me what he means?
John,
Not only are you a leftest socialist democrat Douche Bag, but your a "Lying" Leftest Socialist Democrat Douche Bag as well! Sure, no way to comment.
Anony 11:14 a.m., it must make yourself feel good about yourself to make those comments.
But, that is what morally bankrupt people such as yourself do...
It's spelled "leftist", brave Anony.
Look, The Unwashed Douchebags are running out of steam........ Maybe DNC is running out of money for their paid protestors?
Protests Losing Momentum?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UX_Q0a4pUyU&NR=1
I guess that explains all the advertisements for the paid protesting gigs.
John,
Im sorry for insulting.
Pls acept this link as a gift.
Peace
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOo2nzvNGnw
We have finally found the man who has reached the pinnacle of the leftist life style !
This is what every uunshaven, unwashed, street protesting, flag burning douche bag aspires to be!
The Unionist, Leftist, Socialist, Obama Loving, Sodomite Way of life revealed in all its glory!
Please read: Strauss-Kahn shares the love
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/deangelis/110517
Birds of a Feather! Obama & Socialist IMF Boss Strauss-Kahn Link to Picture:
http://www.tunisie-presse.com/international/images/obimla.jpg
Anony 10:23 a.m., I certainly do not hope that you go to church and tell everyone how you follow the good book to a T. Because God knows you would be lying with your generalizations and accusations. It is unbecoming of a Christian, and going down this path can only lead to self-destruction and the loss of your soul.
I'm a devil worshiping Jew, so your chiding of me is unimportant.
So go fuck yourself, Church Lady.
Thank you
Your mockery of religion is an affront to everything Dad29 supposedly stands for. Yet, I wonder why he provides you a forum for your foul language and psychotic behavior? Birds of feather flock together?
Just thinking that people like you exist gives me the willies!
Your welcome.
Post a Comment