Charlie brought up the 'net Kill-Switch' thing.
Interesting response. What SOUND like young folks are defending the 'kill-switch' idea--even while admitting that such is a totalitarian-state procedure.
(It's also interesting that those arguing for a kill-switch are working hard to bring GWB into the discussion.)
One should be concerned for the country when yout' are endorsing totalitarianism for the sake of "security."
While at the same time the argument is made that "guns in the hands of civilians are dangerous."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
no link?
Franklin comes to mind here.
"Those who sacrifice liberty for security, deserve neither."
Post a Comment