Yah, I know. You're not really shocked.
Congress and the public have been told — for over a year — that the dismissal of the New Black Panther case resulted from nothing more than a dispute between lowly career civil servants. Lapdog reporters have repeated this lie, if they even covered the case at all. The documents uncovered by Judicial Watch expose the ruse. --Morrissey, qouting Judicial Watch
The #2 banana in Justice was involved, as was another political appointee. Just co-incidence that that political appointee has a long history of election law background, mostly for (D) clientele.
Had enough "Chicago Style" yet?
Hot Air
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Yep, it apparently proves that a political appointee exchanged emails about the case and expressed thoughts about it.
It does NOT prove that this person was involved in the decision or even influenced it and, therefore, does not prove that Perez lied.
Post a Comment