Yup. That passes as argument, to the Intellectualoids.
McIlheran provides two examples; here's another. Notice that the operative word in this finely constructed and elegant argument is "hate," which requires no proof. It's subjective, you see. So what Other Side declares to be "hate" is "hate."
When you get into the comments, you notice that there's no there there, in his responses; there can't be.
So back to "hate," which explains it all.
Rush wastes a lot of airtime with his "racist sexist homophobe" descriptors; he should simply stick to "I'm a hater."
Easier logic for the Left to follow....