Friday, September 16, 2011

So What's Not in THIS Article?

I reported last Sunday that the driver is an illegal alien.

You won't find that in the article.

13 comments:

Jim said...

They didn't report whether or not he is married, has children, has tattoos or hair on his butt either. Probably just as relevant as his immigration status.

Anonymous said...

Wow Jim, you saying that the paper does not routinely mention when a crime suspect has other legal issues?

They do it for previous convictions, current warrants, sex offender registration, etc..

Everything BUT illegal immigrants.

Keep up the hope and change Jim. Another year and hopefully we can start actually protecting our police and citizens from these criminals.

David

Jim said...

The current president has done more to enforce immigration laws than the last one.

TerryN said...

Except for his family members who are here illegally.

Jim said...

One is, one is not. But so what? Do you have some evidence that the President has intervened one way or another?

By the way Anon, being in the US illegally is not a crime. So why would a newspaper report it?

Dad29 said...

They'd report it if it were pertinent to THEIR agenda, of course.

My agenda differs from that of the MFM.

Jim said...

"They'd report it if it were pertinent to THEIR agenda"

Back at ya!

Dad29 said...

I never pretended to be a "news" paper.

They haven't, either , in the last 20 years.

Anonymous said...

Sorry, still trying to wrap my head around the "breaking the law is not a crime" comment.

David

Jim said...

Entering the country illegally is a criminal act. Being in the country illegally is a civil matter, not criminal. Many, many people have entered the country legally but remained after their visa has expired. They are not committing a crime by being here. They are in violation of civil law, not criminal.

Anonymous said...

So Jim, he entered the country legally?

David

Jim said...

Who knows? Not relevant to the incident.

Anonymous said...

You said they did not report it because it was not a criminal history, then defined it could be a criminal history, now saying it's irrelevant.........

I call BS. A criminal hit a bike cop with a car, the JS refuses to release the fact that he is a criminal and you are just fine with that.

At least admit it.

David