Thursday, December 10, 2009

Like Raw Climate Data? Look Here

From Greenland, about 50,000 years' worth of central-core temperatures.

And from the Antarctic, about 400,000 years' worth of same.

Just for perspective.

WHOA!! There IS a "hockey stick!!!" You can thank God, folks.


7 comments:

M.E. said...

Excellent link, thank you!

J. Strupp said...

About that hockey stick. Via Ritholz:


http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/climate-change-deniers-vs-the-consensus/

Deekaman said...

Science is not a "consensus". Nor does it do it's work in secret and destroy the original data. Nor does it cherry pick. Nor does it use perjorative terms against those who disagree.

Sorry Strupp. (OK, I'm not)

TerryN said...

Excellent link. Looks more like a saw blade than a hockey stick when you don't cherry pick the data you want.

J. Strupp said...

Science can be a consensus. You know, the earth actually revolves around the sun, gravity does, in fact, exist, and the Theory of Evolution.......stuff like that.

Disgruntled Car Salesman said...

"Theory".

Nuf said.

Deekaman said...

No, science is not "consensus". It is either "fact" or "theory". Show me an historical writing where the word consensus, or even one like it was used. No, this term is only used to justify (alleged) AGW.