And from the Antarctic, about 400,000 years' worth of same.
Just for perspective.
WHOA!! There IS a "hockey stick!!!" You can thank God, folks.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- Dad29
- Old. Nasty. Likes Chesterton, Gregorian Chant and other real music. Calvin's cool. Target- and varmint-shooter, and have trained ALL my children in the craft.
Followers
Gadsden
Don't Tread on Me
Links
- American Economic Alert
- Boots and Sabers
- Catholic Caveman
- Catholic World News Opinion
- Chesterton & Friends
- Christus Vincit
- FreeRepublicLatestPosts
- Grim's Hall
- John Lott's Website
- Lakeshore Laments
- LawDog Files
- ManWithBlackHat
- Moonbattery
- New Liturgical Movement
- No Runny Eggs
- Other McCain
- Overlawyered
- Planet Moron
- Shark&Shepherd
- Sykes
- Terrence Berres
- The Curt Jester
- The Marquette Warrior
- The Onion: REAL News
- Vox Day
- What the Prayer REALLY Says
- Wigderson
7 comments:
Excellent link, thank you!
About that hockey stick. Via Ritholz:
http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/climate-change-deniers-vs-the-consensus/
Science is not a "consensus". Nor does it do it's work in secret and destroy the original data. Nor does it cherry pick. Nor does it use perjorative terms against those who disagree.
Sorry Strupp. (OK, I'm not)
Excellent link. Looks more like a saw blade than a hockey stick when you don't cherry pick the data you want.
Science can be a consensus. You know, the earth actually revolves around the sun, gravity does, in fact, exist, and the Theory of Evolution.......stuff like that.
"Theory".
Nuf said.
No, science is not "consensus". It is either "fact" or "theory". Show me an historical writing where the word consensus, or even one like it was used. No, this term is only used to justify (alleged) AGW.
Post a Comment