The story's headline:
Walker Signs Bills He Says Will Help Protect Children.
"He says"?
Does the JS "think" otherwise?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- Dad29
- Old. Nasty. Likes Chesterton, Gregorian Chant and other real music. Calvin's cool. Target- and varmint-shooter, and have trained ALL my children in the craft.
Followers
Gadsden
Don't Tread on Me
Links
- American Economic Alert
- Boots and Sabers
- Catholic Caveman
- Catholic World News Opinion
- Chesterton & Friends
- Christus Vincit
- FreeRepublicLatestPosts
- Grim's Hall
- John Lott's Website
- Lakeshore Laments
- LawDog Files
- ManWithBlackHat
- Moonbattery
- New Liturgical Movement
- No Runny Eggs
- Other McCain
- Overlawyered
- Planet Moron
- Shark&Shepherd
- Sykes
- Terrence Berres
- The Curt Jester
- The Marquette Warrior
- The Onion: REAL News
- Vox Day
- What the Prayer REALLY Says
- Wigderson
6 comments:
They are hard-pressed to believe Walker wants anything for children but their untimely death. Preferably by either starvation or lack of "access to healthcare" (and especially if they die at the door to the hospital after being thrown out by the evil insurance companies and the Koch Brothers).
In the article, Walker is quoted as saying, "This bill marks another important step in protecting children".
In other words, the headline is accurate and appropriate.
Wrong-o, Jimbo.
The appropriate headline would be: WALKER SIGNS CHILD-PROTECTION BILLS
B/C "He Says" is recognized j-school putdown and dissent lingo.
You ought to read more often.
I read all the time, Dadio.
"He Says" is recognized j-school putdown and dissent lingo.
And I'd be happy to read any citation you could provide to demonstrate that.
The JS said they endorsed Walker for governor.
Post a Comment