Technically, any hard-left campaign against the Catholic Church is not "new," as any attack on Right Order is, directly or indirectly, an attack on the Church. So the transgender campaign--an attack on the order of Creation--eventually became an attack on the Catholic Church, which stands for Right Order as evidenced in Creation. (Yes, that attack is also against many other denominations which still hold to that order, but the Catholic Church is by far the most visible--and the strongest.)
One facet of the attack is in the pro-life arena:
An open letter penned by the left-wing groups known as Faith in Public Life (FPL) and Faithful America has called for the removal of Archbishop Joseph Naumann of Kansas City, Kansas, as chair of the U.S. bishops’ pro-life committee after Naumann said President Joe Biden should stop professing to be a “devout” Catholic....
The Bishop is correct. Biden's stance on abortion is an undisguised and ferocious attack on innocent life; it is contrary to the laws of nature and nature's God.
Meantime, a divorce attorney in the Madison area launched another attack on the Church, stating that the US Conference of Catholic Bishops conducted a 'stealth' campaign against a national suicide-prevention hotline. Why did they do that? He claimed that USCC did this because it "might happen to assist LBGT+ people."
That's a deliberate gross falsification of USCC's reasoning on the matter. USCC opposed the hotline's "gender-identity" guidelines (and funding), which are contrary to--you guessed it--the order of Creation.
Some wise men referred to the order of Creation as "Nature" a couple hundred years ago, and they were also clear about "nature's God." They were not Catholics, but they knew what is important.
So does Satan, and he is baring his teeth through the hard-Left.
2 comments:
This, from the man who was justifying vaccine-injuries and even deaths only a few posts ago? You wouldn't know the Hard Left if it hit you on the head, which it clearly already has. To be on Christ's side is to accept His principles as inviolable, which--by characterizing the infringement of the sanctity of life as a "necessary evil" where vaccines are concerned--you refuse to do. In this you dishonor the American Founding Fathers simultaneously, who for all their faults recognized the right to life as foremost and self-evident.
Please link to the post which you're talking about. Your remark(s) are difficult to follow, which is natural when writers are not thinking clearly.
But since you will not find me 'characterizing the infringement of life as a "necessary evil,"' perhaps you'll figure out your error.
Or maybe not.
Post a Comment