Mike McDaniel eviscerates Michael Medved's WSJ essay in which Medved postulates that Obama is a good guy who simply seeks re-election by any expedient.
...The problem, for Mr. Medved, and the nation, is that mere incompetence cannot adequately explain away Mr. Obama’s background, his expressed and implied beliefs, or his associations, appointments, and official actions. Believing that he actually wishes America harm is, in light of the voluminous and growing evidence, not unfounded but logical — not a reactionary, emotional conclusion but a reasonable one based on objective evidence, most of which has been provided by Mr. Obama himself.
McDaniel provides a short list (only 17 examples) of Obama's problematic actions. There are lots more he could have used.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment