Well, that's not exactly what Justice Noonan said.
But it's close.
“I’ve read your brief, I’ve read the District Court opinion, I’ve heard your interchange with my two colleagues, and I don’t understand your argument,” Noonan told deputy solicitor general Edwin S. Kneedler. “We are dependent as a court on counsel being responsive. . . . You keep saying the problem is that a state officer is told to do something. That’s not a matter of preemption. . . . I would think the proper thing to do is to concede that this is a point where you don’t have an argument.”
But hey! It's only taxpayer money.
HT: Malkin
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment