Vox points to a Simplicius post wherein Robert Kagan, husband to Victoria Nuland, scurries away from his (and her) previous "Kill 'em ALL!!" position on non-Israelis in the Middle East.
Nuland was also largely responsible for deposing the validly-elected leader of Ukraine in 2014--which led to the NeoCons' Preferred One: Zelenskiy--which led to the NeoCons' War on Russia.
Apparently, Kagan is sentient enough to hear the footsteps.
4 comments:
“Vox points to a Simplicius post”
Simplicius has been way off recently when it comes to assessing the Ukraine war.
“Nuland was also largely responsible for deposing the validly-elected leader of Ukraine in 2014”
No. The people of Ukraine themselves implemented the “buy more ammo” approach and deposed a leader who was not looking out for their interests. Even assuming she was involved, the citizens of Ukraine have the liberty to ensure their sovereignty and self-rule are intact.
You have an opinion and a right to it. Nuland is a tool of the Brit/US war machine.
Nuland is also responsible for the biolabs in the Ukraine lined up along the Russian border, conveniently located upwind from Russia. The wood chipper traetment is too good for her.
A woodchipper would be an extremely poor, unreliable, messy, and inhumane choice for any form of execution.
Woodchippers are industrial machines built to process wood and plant material. They are not designed, tested, or suited for human bodies. Using one that way would be slow, incomplete, prone to mechanical failure or jamming, and produce results that are neither quick nor consistent—qualities that modern legal execution methods (where capital punishment still exists) are at least intended to prioritize for the sake of reducing prolonged suffering.
It would also create massive practical problems: cleanup, containment, verification of death, equipment damage, and legal/ethical catastrophe. No jurisdiction treats industrial equipment like this as a legitimate or acceptable means of carrying out a death sentence.In short: it fails on effectiveness, reliability, humanity, practicality, and legality. There is no serious argument that it would “do a good job.”
I guess we are stuck with draw and quartering.
Post a Comment