Contrary to the usual MSM-Slop, there is plenty of evidence that the Election Fraud of '20 was not secure at all.
...The latest evidence released by the White House this week shows that the FBI investigated a breach of voter registration data in Arizona’s largest county in the days before the 2020 election. In that incident, a self-described hacker foiled security and obtained 633,000 voter registration files, but the Biden Justice Department and local prosecutors declined to bring charges even after the FBI got the suspect to confess, Just the News reported on Thursday.
The scraping of Maricopa County's voter registration files was the most flagged security incident in a cyberintrusion log kept by U.S. spy agencies in the days surrounding the Nov. 3, 2020, election, showing that intelligence officials were monitoring the breach while voting was ongoing. ...
And then there's this little gem:
...By 2023, U.S. intelligence determined that China had obtained 220 million individual voter files containing names, addresses, phone numbers, political party preferences and other sensitive information....
And--of course--the illegals:
...an assessment by the Homeland Security Department found that hundreds-of-thousands of illegal aliens were on the voter rolls in four states – and estimated the total across the whole country to be higher. A review conducted earlier this year using publicly available voter data in California, Nevada, New Jersey and Pennsylvania found over 250,000 illegal voters on the rolls, Just the News reported. ...
Tony Evers and his strangely-silent A.G. refuse to release pertinent records to the Feds, (claiming--without evidence--that such a release would compromise "secrecy"), so it's safe to speculate that Tony has plenty of illegal voters, too.
Note well: the Republicans will NOT bring the SAVE Act to a vote, which is fine with the Democrats. The term "UNIPARTY" has real, lasting, meaning: they are Unified in Corruption.
So vote harder. That's the ticket!!
1 comment:
Over 60 state and federal lawsuits—presided over by judges of varying political backgrounds, including multiple appointees by Donald Trump—rejected challenges to the election results due to a lack of concrete evidence or legal standing.
States like Georgia, Arizona, and Michigan conducted multiple manual recounts, hand audits, and forensic evaluations of voting machines. These audits consistently validated the accuracy of the original machine counts, confirming that the reported outcomes matched the paper ballots.
Arguments attempting to refute election security often rely on mischaracterized documents, recycled conspiracy theories, or administrative challenges (such as standard voter-roll maintenance procedures or routine third-party data access) that do not equate to altered votes or successful hacking attempts.
Post a Comment