EPA's Mengelization of "science" has echoes in less-direct assaults on the truth.
...On Wednesday, the USGS released reports outlining tests it had conducted in April on two U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) monitoring wells at Encana’s Pavilion gas field in Wyoming.
Hock said there was nothing surprising about the USGS results, noting that USGS did a credible job of sampling, said Hock.
“More importantly, however, is the fact that USGS only sampled one of the two EPA monitoring wells (MW). This goes to the heart of concerns raised previously by state and federal agencies as well as Encana,” said Hock.
The USGS report seemed to indicate that the agency declined to sample MW02 because the well could not provide a sample that was representative of actual water quality conditions, Hock said.
Uh-huh. Then comes this:
A comparison of EPA reported detections in EPA Well MW01 and USGS results show that the USGS results are inconsistent with the EPA
results on the levels of toluene, xylenes, isopropanol, diethylene
glycol, triethylene glycol, 2-Butoxyethanol and acetone. The USGS did not detect these in its tests.
For two components — potassium and DRO — the USGS results show significant decreases in concentrations versus the EPA results, according to a comparison by Encana of EPA and USGS data.
Imagine that! Extra chemicals found only by EPA.
HT: Lakeshore
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment