Last Refuge publishes THE reason for Trump to retain Tulsi Gabbard.
...If you want to hold the Spygate/Russiagate folks accountable, it’s not going to be the DOJ who matter; not directly. It is the Intelligence Community that matters.
If you seek accountability, and if you want to stop Lawfare from exploiting the silo defenses, it’s the IC that matters; not the Dept of Justice. The transition team was putting emphasis on the wrong syllable. Remember, my emphasis was on the need for institutional accountability on Spygate and Russiagate, and the DOJ is a tool toward the goal but not the ultimate weapon.
♦ Secondly, and specifically because of this issue, if you don’t confront the IC bad actors directly, if you don’t disassemble their power structures, you are going to end up with Main Justice in a constant position of defense, because the DOJ is downstream from the determinations of the Intelligence Community....
Why?
Because SCOTUS agrees: if the Intel Community says something is classified/national security, it CANNOT be used in open court trials.
Gabbard is de-classifying all sorts of information which should never have been "classified" in the first damn place. A lot--if not all--of it will embarrass a number of US (and certain FOREIGN) officials.
That is the reason that you read rumors, coming from CIA/FBI insiders through London-based "news" outlets, that Tulsi is on the chopping block. You can bet that some of those "foreign" officials are from a certain little country in the Middle East which has well-monied friends in the US--which friends make large political contributions to all sorts of Executive AND Legislative-branch figures.
That's why Tulsi is invaluable to ordinary Joe Lunchbox Americans.
Keep your eyes on the real ball.....
6 comments:
Nope.
She will be dumped.
Biondi was booted because she wasn’t going engaging in the type of lawfare that Trump demanded, and she hasn’t satisfactorily protected him from Epstein’s files.
Noem was jettisoned because she has been a train wreck. Pretty bad when she (lol, a God fearing woman) has an ongoing affair and Trump knows about it. He hung her out to dry.
Hegseth is next. Trump put himself into a corner with Iran. Petey will get blamed. Good riddance.
But you keep thinking, Dad29, that Trump’s brain isn’t mush and he isn’t pilfering the American taxpayer.
You know why Biondi was dumped? When the NYT and DNC can't find problems for Trump in the Mossad agent's files, ...you say '"It's Trump."
Trump was taught how to play LawFare by the Left and their willing bend-over pals in the Deep State. He came in and discovered their billions of dollars in fraud, self-dealing, and racketeering a/k/a "NGOs" and "welfare organizations." Grinding those people into dust is too good for them and Biondi's shilly-shallying got her what she deserved.
Sure.
Noem--yes--was a problem.
Trump still is being protected. Much more about him on the files.
And you KNOW this........how?
Your idiotic jackassery is going to be deleted going forward.
The primary ways Bondi was accused of protecting Trump include:
Heavily Redacted Releases: Under Bondi’s leadership, the DOJ released "Phase 1" of the declassified Epstein files in early 2025, which were criticized for being largely comprised of already public information and containing extensive redactions.
Withholding Key Documents: Critics and investigative reports alleged that her office intentionally delayed or withheld documents that contained damaging claims, including unsubstantiated accusations that Trump sexually assaulted a minor.
Censoring Trump’s Name: It was reported that Bondi oversaw the "censoring, deletion, and redaction" of Trump’s name and incidents involving him throughout the files.
Stonewalling and Delays: Representative Dan Goldman and other members of the House Oversight Committee accused Bondi of a "concerted effort" to delay or prevent the full release of the files, potentially at Trump’s direction.
Denying the "Client List": Despite initially hinting that an Epstein "client list" was on her desk, Bondi later issued a DOJ memo stating that "no incriminating client list" existed, a move seen by skeptics as a way to end public scrutiny of the President's past associates.
Yes Must keep TULSI!!!!!
Read about Suckling Weasel named Michael Atkinson
.....Tulsi declassified Atkinson’s investigative file. What she found —and what the file shows— is that the “nonpartisan” inspector general was anything but nonpartisan. He twisted the rules into a mall pretzel shape to fit the “crimes.” He ignored the actual transcript of Trump’s call with Zelensky, and instead relied on four unnamed “whistleblowers”— none of whom heard the call and all of whom were easily impeachable for obvious political bias.........
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/custody-and-control-monday-april
Post a Comment