Sunday, April 19, 2026

Iran vs. USA Began in 1953

 Stuff here worth knowing.  You won't get this from Fox News nor the White House.

 ...America’s troubled relationship with the Iranian people dates not from the 1979 U.S. embassy hostage crisis but from 1953, when the United States and Britain clandestinely overthrew the country’s fledgling democracy and instituted the brutal dictatorship of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the country’s latest (and, as it would turn out, last) foreign puppet-ruler....

That was a British-inspired move; the Brits wanted the petroleum and promised to share it with the US.  By the way, the Little-Boy-Pahlavi running around claiming that he can move right in and take over ruling Iran?  Not likely at all

The democracy that the US overthrew (thanks, Allen Dulles!) was actually favored by the Shi'a Muslim clerisy.

... Shia Islam had been adopted by Iran in the 16th century as a form of resistance against the perceived tyranny of the Ottoman empire, whose caliphs claimed the right to rule the whole Muslim world as the successors of Muhammad and sought to encroach on Iranian sovereignty....

... the 18th-century American British colonists were fascinated by Iran’s Shia resistance to the Ottoman empire and saw it as a fulfillment of Persia’s long tradition of civilized refinement and benign rule stretching back to Cyrus the Great. In fact, colonial Americans developed a sort of love affair and even obsession with Iran in the early 18th century....

It's American, ya'know, to become a formal ally of dictators--so long as they dictate in a US direction.  So Turkey is a member of NATO, and the Shi'a are now The Enemy.

Hard to keep up, ain'a--unless you own shares of British Petroleum (BP--the "green" gas stations.)

Unfortunately for the first Pahlavi dictator, he got palsy with one A. Hitler.  So the Brits and Russkies got rid of him and installed his son as the Shiny New Shah--and the Brits took the petroleum in exchange.

... However, the new shah faced strongly democratic forces in Iran that were backed by much of the Shia clergy, who were seeking the country’s independence from foreign economic and political control. By 1951, the parliament had forced the shah to accept the strongly reformist Mohammad Mosaddegh as the country’s prime minister. Mosaddegh immediately began to curtail the power of the shah and to nationalize the country’s oil industry....

Can't have THAT!!  So MI6 and CIA saw to the elimination of Masaddegh, leaving Pahlavi solely in charge.

Then comes a twist that will shock most Americans (it did that to me, too.)

 ...The United States and the State of Israel began to work with the shah to ensure that nothing would threaten his rule in the future. With the help of the CIA and Israel’s Mossad, Mohammad Reza established SAVAK, a secret police force that would arrest political dissidents and systematically torture them in hidden prisons. Thousands of Iranians suffered this fate, including intellectuals who had been able to freely publish and speak only a few years earlier....

 In return.......

... The shah abolished all political parties in the parliament, restricting who could run and permitting only a single, pro-shah party that acted as a rubber stamp and a defender of his absolute rule. He dutifully invited the United States to send its major oil companies, including Exxon, Mobil, and Texaco, to manage the country’s oil resources and take 50 percent of the profits along with British Petroleum....

Fifty percent?  That's the classic "Beyond the Dreams of Avarice."

... By the late 1960s, the shah was so isolated from his people and drunk on power that he scheduled a coronation ceremony to have himself crowned as “Emperor” (literally, “King of Kings”) of Iran, a vanity title from Iran’s ancient past that only had meaning in the narcissistic dream world in which he was living...

The Greeks had a word for that.

The Iranian hoi polloi became restive and the clergy helped move that along, as "progressive" US values pushed by such as Planned Parenthood showed up on scene.

... In 1978, protesters began to hit the streets, encouraged by the Ayatollah Khomeini still in exile, and they were consequently joined by the nation’s Shia clergy and clerical students. The shah’s U.S.-backed military began to massacre street protesters, but each wave of killings brought even more protesters into the streets month after month. Graffiti written on the walls read, “Death to America’s Shah.”...

Jimmuh Cartuh now proved beyond a doubt that he was dumber than GWBush:

 ...The turning point came in late 1978, when Jimmy Carter made a personal phone call to the shah—after a particularly bloody massacre that used helicopter gunships against protesters—in which Carter “reaffirmed the close and friendly relationship between Iran and the United States,” as the White House summarized the call.

The United States had clearly thrown the Iranian dissidents under the bus. The population became more enraged and protests continued to grow. Finally, the shah fled the country, and in February of 1979 the Ayatollah Khomeini returned from exile in a plane filled with Western journalists, now received by colossal mobs of literally millions of joyful supporters, and by almost the whole range of political opinion, as the de facto leader of the Iranian Revolution....

Cahtuh's stupidity ensured that the Iranians would keep the hostages until he left power in the US.  Maybe you believe the fable that the Ayatollah feared Reagan?  Actually, the Ayatollah was working as hard as he could to FREE the hostages.  He had morals, unlike certain current US and Israeli leaders.

... Iran soon began to ally itself with other countries and causes linked to anti-colonialism in the Middle East and worldwide, especially with fellow Shias. When Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982 and committed a massacre against thousands of Palestinian refugees at Sabra and Shatila under the protection of U.S. Marine “peacekeepers,” Iran began to aid Shia Muslim organizations in the area that eventually came together to form Hezbollah (the “Party of God”), a political party and militia created to resist the Israeli occupation....

But Netanyahu tells you that Hezbollah does that massacre thing.  Yah, well, they were taught the technique by Israel.

 ...When American corporations tried to break the ice and begin doing business with Iran again in the mid-’90s, neoconservative pundits, AIPAC lobbyists, and the State of Israel went to work to shut them down....

... a multi-billion-dollar oil drilling deal with Conoco was nixed by Bill Clinton via a seeping executive order in 1995, which prohibited virtually all commerce, either direct or indirect, with Iran....

So Iran began to develop nuclear power plants.  That technology was given to them by none other than the good old USA.

Why are the Houthis so nasty?

 ...When the United States invaded Iraq in 2003, Iran gave arms to Shia militias there to help them run the United States out of the country. Meanwhile, the United States and Israel funded the Sunni-aligned terrorists affiliated with Al Qaeda and ISIS, enabling them to wreak chaos in Syria and to finally install an Israel-friendly, Sunni regime. The United States also continued to support Israel in its own terrorist policies against the Palestinians and other Arab countries in the region. In turn, the Iranians built up Hezbollah to a massive fighting force and made an alliance with the Houthis in Yemen, while also supporting the Palestinian Sunni Muslim party Hamas, in Gaza....

Now Trump has both feet planted in the quicksand in a monumental case of FAFO for the US.

Israel it holding our coat.  How very sportsmanlike of them! 

 .

1 comment:

Grim said...

There were a number of major miscalculations made by the United States in the 1950s. The United States emerged in 1945 as the sole power in the world: it had an untouched industrial base, a powerful and world-spanning Navy, a strong army, and the only atomic weapons in the world. What it didn't have was any idea how to proceed in most of the world: it had experience in the Philippines and its own hemisphere, with opening Japan and China, but not much experience in the Middle East, Africa, Southeast Asia, etc.

What it fell in on was taking the advice of its WWII allies, especially the UK and France -- the Soviets not so much! As a consequence, it got dragged into a number of problems, most notably Vietnam but also these messes in the Middle East that it inherited from the UK.

Egypt is another one, by the way; we don't hear that much about it because the current junta (which also overthrew a democratically elected government, one aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood and rapidly turning Egypt into an Islamist state) is keeping the lid on right now. That's all anyone wanted from the Shah; it's all they wanted in Latin America from a number of similar partnerships. It's what they wanted and almost got in South Vietnam as they also did, and did get, in South Korea.

But it was just a heuristic. Nobody really knew what they were doing, and our allies were using us to pursue their own interests rather than helping us understand what might really be best in any of these places.