Ted Cruz was something of an option in 2015/6, even though he was a dyed-in-the-wool Establishment Pubbie. Cruz made some of the right noises, but just couldn't get the Reagan Democrats to fall into line.
Now he's decided to revert to GOPe standards. Talk stupid, be deliberately wrong.
"Lying Ted" is more than just a label.
...“President Trump’s rhetoric, I think, went way too far over the line. I think it was both reckless and irresponsible because he said repeatedly—and he said over and over again—he won by a landslide; there was massive fraud; it was all stolen everywhere. That evidence, the campaign did not prove that in any court, and to make a determination about an election it has to be based on the evidence, and so simply saying the result you want, that’s not responsible and you’ve never heard me use language like that....
OK, Teddy. Whatever. No Court ACCEPTED any evidence, which is plain as your newly-hipster beard on that Hahhvahhhd face of yours.
Trump won. PA, WI, GA, AZ, NV, and MI were all heavy-on-fraud, and no machine chicanery was needed, although that may have been in play too.
Being a NeverTrumperLiar will get you Beto, Teddy. And you deserve it.
6 comments:
Cruz may not be for sale, but he is available for short term lease.
Disclosure: I was a Cruz supporter/voter.
WAS.
yep. me too Dad.....I think a LOT of eyes have been opened.
In the same way the church traitors have been outed, so have all the RINOS and outright traitors. There's a record of what all of them have done and said.
Trump supporters are engaged and paying attention. At this point, perhaps others feel as I do, if it's going to be impossible by virtue of chronic fraud to get a true Republican in there, no RINO is going to get my help. I'd rather vote Democrat than put a RINO in office again. We see the outcome is the same.
I'm not at all saying Ted is a RINO or traitor, I'm saying, Republicans should be mindful of the engaged nature of conservatives. We have eyes and ears.
Didn't Cruz at one point say he was willing to argue for Trump before the Supreme Court?
Yup.
Question now: what would he argue? He doesn't seem to believe what's more and more obvious: Wisconsin, AZ, and NV were flat-out stolen.
PA and MI were frauds, too.....
Post a Comment