Wisconsin native. "The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him."--GKC "Liberalism is the modern and morbid habit of always sacrificing the normal to the abnormal" --G K Chesterton "The only objective of Liberty is Life" --G K Chesterton "A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition." -- Rudyard Kipling
It is true that "reporters" do not graduate from law school.
But they may have an editor, or maybe a friend, who knows elementary trial law.
AFFADAVITS ARE EVIDENCE, you miserable clucks.
Stop with your ridiculous kindergarten lying.
3 comments:
An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may require you to testify to the affidavit or they may consider it hearsay. Since hearsay is not admissible as evidence, an affidavit may not be used for evidence if someone objects to it unless they testify. So it comes down to those witnesses coming to court to speak on their own behalf, realizing that they may be cross examined.
Thus, I look forward to those individuals coming out en masse and standing side by side Guiliani and company at their next public appearance on Monday.
I look forward to those individuals coming out en masse and standing side by side Guiliani and company at their next public appearance on Monday.
Good. You do that--even though your straw-man setup remains irrelevant until the trial(s) begin.
Thanks for proving my point, however. Once again, Pravda is wrong.
@Anonymous
You couldn't be further from the TRUTH ... or the law, as the case may be, pun intended.
Death Bed Confessions, for instance, are considered Affidavits even though "unsigned", but are usually witnessed by credible individuals, ie, cops ("credible" used loosely here), nurses, doctors, witnesses, etc. Death Bed Confessions can be admissable evidence into proceedings and matters even though unsigned nor declaratory from a witness stand by The Principal of the Affidavit.
There is no carte blanche laws nor rules for allowing Affidavits as evidence. It depends upon Federal Mandates, State Statutes, local Ordinances, District, type of Court (local Municipal, Circuit, State, Federal, Tax, etc), judge, even, to a lesser extent, the influence of the DA, etc. It also depends on law, spirit of law, colour of law, and how either standup or corrupt judicial officials handle the evidence.
There are SO many factors and parameters, legal AND corrupt, involved that there is no way to tell. In one District or Court, the Affidavit as evidence may be allowed and in others it may be completely and summarily dismissed.
Only one thing is for certain. Our Judiciary in this Country is as corrupt as our .gov, and, thus, anything can happen, and anything is possible ... maybe not legal nor Constitutional, but possible.
Post a Comment