Another study in two men.
...Regarding Cupich, one cannot fail to note his ostentatious arrogance,
and the insolence with which he denies the evidence that is now obvious
to all: that 80% of the abuses found were committed against young adults
by homosexuals who were in a relationship of authority over their
victims. During the speech he gave when he took possession of the
Chicago See, at which I was present as a representative of the Pope,
Cupich quipped that one certainly should not expect the new Archbishop
to walk on water. Perhaps it would be enough for him to be able to
remain with his feet on the ground and not try to turn reality
upside-down, blinded by his pro-gay ideology, as he stated in a recent
interview with America Magazine. Extolling his particular expertise in
the matter, having been President of the Committee on Protection of
Children and Young People of the USCCB, he asserted that the main
problem in the crisis of sexual abuse by clergy is not homosexuality,
and that affirming this is only a way of diverting attention from the
real problem which is clericalism. In support of this thesis, Cupich
“oddly” made reference to the results of research carried out at the
height of the sexual abuse of minors crisis in the early 2000s, while he
“candidly” ignored that the results of that investigation were totally
denied by the subsequent Independent Reports by the John Jay College of
Criminal Justice in 2004 and 2011, which concluded that, in cases of
sexual abuse, 81% of the victims were male. --Excerpted from the letter of Cdl. Vigano, former Vatican [Ambassador] to the US
"Ostentatious arrogance." Hmmmm.
Contrast with Fr. Frank Phillips, accused (many say dishonestly) of a 'non-criminal' act (both in Canon Law and in civil law) so as to force him to give up the pastor's slot at St. John Cantius of Chicago.
You never heard a peep from Fr. Phillips, other than "I'm leaving and will be moving to St Louis."
Humility.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Minor point, Dad. Vigano is not a Cardinal, but an Archbishop.
He should have been a Cardinal. But after he tried to expose corruption in the Curia (when Secretary General of the Governatorate of Vatican City in a letter to Pope Benedict), he was shipped off to the US as Nuncio and never made a Cardinal - under the rubric of 'promoveatur ut amoveatur'.
I believe he is a stand-up, honest guy, which is more than can be said about the people he named.
Post a Comment