Note how well the MSM colluded with the (D) liars last time around. They succeeded: Gingrich became the Worst Nightmare Your Kids Ever Had.
So. In order to have this nightmare, Obama needs an excuse.
President Barack Obama would veto the House-approved long-term spending bill for the federal government that contains the Pence Amendment, a measure that would de-fund the Planned Parenthood abortion business.
Because of that provision and other pro-life riders that stop abortion funding globally and in the District of Columbia, the Washington Times indicates “Obama has issued a veto threat on that bill, saying House Republicans’ cuts are unacceptable.” --LifeSite News quoted at Gateway
Obama is happy to sacrifice 1/3rd of a million lives in order to keep Death Panels.
Or something like that.
14 comments:
I would support Obama for vetoing such a misguided cut.
You would stand rank and file with those who would not pass a budget without a Pence Amendment. They are the ones who would shut down the government because they don't understand the concept of compromise.
Baby-killing ain't subject to "compromise."
Tell your brother to start looking for another job.
What about the babies of workers laid off by Scooter? Do they count?
Ain't no "baby-killing" in the equation. Federal funding does not fund abortions, so if you want to cut down on the "baby killing", continue to fund sex education, health services and contraception.
Right-o, Jimbo.
Giving money to Hitler's Youth Camps NEVER enabled him to open Oszwieczim.
Sex Ed? Like the version advocated by the safe schools czar (fisting)? Or Northwestern U (porn with toys)? Or by the NEA chief for the UN (homosexual, masturbation and orgasm)? Or should we just stick with condoms on cucumbers and bananas?
The Federal funding for all of the above should be zero.
Leave it to mom to have a problem with orgasm.
Only when it is being "taught" to school children Jim.
Tasty.
Now I'm going to rape Foust tonight.
Oh Anonymous, you're soooo romantic!
Dad29 advocates sodomy. If the anony at 8:25 a.m. dared to even reference, rather disturbingly I may add, his family, he would have a hissy fit and immediately deleted the comment.
But since the reference is made to Foust, a known political burr in Dad29's saddle, no effort is made to remove the offensive remarks which go directly against the tenets of the RCC.
But why should Dad29 (or the pious Neo-Mom) care, he's (she's) going to heaven!
Dad29 does have the ability to remove comments, of course. It would seem to be his decision to leave the threats and insults of Anon 8:25. Or maybe he hasn't seen them yet.
Again I ask... who wants to guess if Anon 8:25 is conservative or liberal?
creepy stalker guys are apolitical John. Mental illness knows no political boundary.
And Dad has removed creepy stalker guy before as you know.
Pick me, pick me, Fousty. Well, if the attack is directed at you, and I surmise you are liberal, then it would be another liberal who is jealous of your superior intellect, right?
No? I'm wrong? Well, then it must be a conservative since they are frequent posters here and they find your views to be patently offensive.
neomom--"Creepy stalker guys are apolitical".
Since when does the right (or the left) EVER refuse the opportunity to label their opposition as "from the kook right" or the "fringe left"???
neomom--"Mental illness knows no political boundary".
Right, that's why the liberal posters here have been frequently told they need to take their meds by Dad29.
Furthermore, Dad29 has been rather slow to remove such offenders in the past.
Post a Comment