Yah, I know. Struppster will bop over here and intone that 'Porkulus was not big enough.'OK. See the post above.
HT: Ticker
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- Dad29
- Old. Nasty. Likes Chesterton, Gregorian Chant and other real music. Calvin's cool. Target- and varmint-shooter, and have trained ALL my children in the craft.
Followers
Gadsden
Don't Tread on Me
Links
- American Economic Alert
- Boots and Sabers
- Catholic Caveman
- Catholic World News Opinion
- Chesterton & Friends
- Christus Vincit
- FreeRepublicLatestPosts
- Grim's Hall
- John Lott's Website
- Lakeshore Laments
- LawDog Files
- ManWithBlackHat
- Moonbattery
- New Liturgical Movement
- No Runny Eggs
- Other McCain
- Overlawyered
- Planet Moron
- Shark&Shepherd
- Sykes
- Terrence Berres
- The Curt Jester
- The Marquette Warrior
- The Onion: REAL News
- Vox Day
- What the Prayer REALLY Says
- Wigderson
3 comments:
This chart proves my point actually. G has not sufficiently offset the collapse in C & I.
We find ourselves in a state of limbo with insufficient government stimulus and very little private sector growth.
Porkulus may have been the right size if it had been actually focused into true job stimulating stuff instead of bridge-loaning broke states and, you know, pork. But, Obey and Pelosi knew better...and if a frog had wings, it wouldn't bump its arse a-hoppin'
Glad to hear that you openly support a stimulus package the size of the one enacted last year but would have allocated the funds differently than Congress did.
I would encourage you share this information with your fellow tea party members at the next rally and let them know that it's not necessarily the "spending stupid". The stimulus package, "may have been the right size....."
I don't agree with this opinion of course, but it appears we're making progress.
Post a Comment