Thursday, July 03, 2025

Lies and Murder at SCOWI

Following (and affirming) a Big Lie from an extremist Madison judge, SCOWI ruled that a Wisconsin law forbidding abortion except to save the life of the mother is void.

It is a moral commonplace that lies and murder go together like--say--conception and human life.  Check out the actual story of Roe someday if you doubt us.

The Lie:

 ...Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper ruled in 2023 that the 1849 ban outlaws feticide – which she defined as the killing of a fetus without the mother’s consent – but not consensual abortions....

Uh-huh.  No doubt.  Sure.  Pregnant women sought out the butcher and paid him/her but did NOT consentTotes reasonable.

But the Judges from Murder, Inc., also ignored precedent.  This from Pro-Life Wisconsin:

 ...The Wisconsin Supreme Court has consistently stated that acts of the legislature are presumed to be constitutional and are to be given due deference.

"In Hui v. Castenada (2010), the Court found disfavor with repeal by implication stating, "As we have emphasized, repeals by implication are not favored and will not be presumed unless the intention of the legislature to repeal is clear and manifest." It was certainly never the intent of the legislative authors of modern abortion regulations post-Roe and Casey to repeal s.940.04 or they would have expressly done so. They did not. They were simply attempting to mitigate the ravages of abortion under the onerous dictates of the Roe/Casey legal regime.

"In State of Wisconsin v. Glenndale Black (1994), the Wisconsin Supreme Court was unpersuaded that the legislature intended to repeal s.940.04 when it enacted the Roe-conforming s.940.15. It said, "Implied repeal of statutes by later enactments is not favored in statutory construction."

"And in State v. Zawistowski (1980), the Court specifically held, "All statutes passed and retained by the legislature should be held valid unless the earlier statute is completely repugnant to the later enactment." Section 940.04 of the Wisconsin Statutes is clearly not inconsistent with, offensive or repugnant to modern-day abortion laws.

"In sum, respect for Wisconsin Supreme Court case law history, legislative intent, logic, and justice are not the aim of this radicalized Court; unfettered abortion is....

THE reason that three Abortion Barbies were elected to SCOWI is abortionThey paid their AWFL supporters yesterday. 

No comments: