We'll take bets .........
New election fraud whistleblowers came forward on Tuesday, including a postal subcontractor who was told that over 100,000 ballots in Wisconsin were gathered the day after election day and backdated so that they would still be counted.
The new information was made public at a press conference with multiple whistleblowers by the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society, a national constitutional litigation organization....
Video at this link. We'll also take bets on whether you'll read about this in the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel Pravda or any of the other local "nooz" sources.
And we'll be pleased to lose.
7 comments:
LOL --> Postal subcontractor Nathan Pease says that he was told by two separate postal workers on two separate occasions that the USPS in Wisconsin was gathering over 100,000 ballots on the morning of November 4 to backdate the ballots so that the ballots would be counted even if they arrived after the statutory deadline.
This is not evidence. It is hearsay/rumor.
It's SWORN testimony. Which has nothing to do with whether Teddy Murder-Whisperer Perry's "news" station will cover it.
And of course, "rumor" and "hearsay" are two very different things. Not that I expected an intelligent response....
Hey, jackass Fairy Mason.
It's witness testimony.
Witness testimony is evidence.
Especially when "written into" the "stone" of an affidavit.
Ever been in a courtroom? Know ANYTHING about the law?
Yah, that's what I thought.
You leftist jackasseries bloviating, "there is no evidence", hoping to ingrain the lie in weak minds such as yours', doesn't make it so. Your bad-breathed screamed whining meme of, "no evidence", is really REALLY tired and old now, not to mention completely un-believed at this point. You propogandists really truly waste your time believin' that what you blubber matters, that anyone is listening, that anyone believes your complete bullshit. You guys truly are the wallflowers that were never invited to the parties or, if you were, sat in the corner, ignored, quaffing down some drink as your only friend.
Cuckolded again? Ahhhhh, it's a shame ... or not.
What we DO have is a MOUNTAIN of evidence proving your place The JackAss Fools' Hall Of Shame.
More digital diarrhea from St. Revo. Nothing has changed.
OK, so he swore that he witnessed something that he and you claim to be 100 percent accurate. That does mean it actually happened. Obviously, judges, who are infinitely smarter than the both of you combined, know that there must be more than accusations. So, how about that raid on CIA servers in Germany that gave the election to Biden? You now, the one that Powell promised is a "smoking gun"? Where is that proof?
Well--I'll grant you that judges are not as infinitely stupid as YOU are. They know that in a civil action, only the preponderance of evidence is required to bring an action to trial.
Of course, they have to HEAR the evidence, dummy.
4:31 AM 12/05/2020
@AnnieDandyFannyBoi:
" ... judges, who are infinitely smarter than the both of you combined ... "
You mean the traitorous treasonous Obama-sycophant scum such the likes of the borderline-retarded Nevada filth of a corrupt criminal US-traitor "judge" who ignored over 20 binders of overt in-your-face Election fraud evidence and "summarily" ruled all of it as having "little merit" without so much as cracking one of the binders to peek at anything?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/obama-judge-nevada-denies-trump-campaigns-lawsuit-ignores-20-books-full-evidence/
You mean "judges" like THAT yellow-teethed vomit of human garbage?
You mean "judges" like this bought-and-paid-for Obama Nevada "judge" who is probably getting as butt-f/u/c/ked as OButtGapedHole himself from fairy-pretend-Michelle Michael LaVaughan Robinson, OTrauma's male "wife", who has a dick anyone can see swinging right through its pants (notice the reference to "its" because this monstrosity of filth is certainly no boy nor girl, man nor woman, just a piece of sewage filth)?
You mean THOSE kinds of CREDIBLE "infinitely smarter" "judges"?
Yah ... see your point.
With credibility like THOSE great "patriots" of US judicial originalism, I can ALMOST believe 'em when they puke out to me that their Mommy loves them (cuz no one else does, including Jesus). Yah. Almost. Uh huh. Mmm hmm. Did I mention almost?
Geez, Annie. Yer the same ol' dung heap pile of a complete troll jackass I left behind any number of years ago on here.
Still lurking around elementary school yard playgrounds hoping to get lucky before the cops spot you?
Or have you moved on and ACTUALLY spent time cleaning your toilet now ... or whatever it is you "do" that you think is productive ... 'cuz whatever yer doin' here on this blog sure t'ain't.
Dad29, the judges did hear the evidence and ruled accordingly on the merits of the case. In his lawsuit before the state Supreme Court, Trump was not alleging fraud. Instead, he argued long-standing election practices were illegal and asked to throw out hundreds of thousands of votes in Dane and Milwaukee counties. He did not ask to toss votes in Republican parts of Wisconsin, even though ballots there were cast the same way.
Hagedom got it right.
And, right on cue, more digital barf from St. Revo. Things haven't changed.
Post a Comment