An internet sage living in West Virginia will counsel you: "No Excitement Until the Indictment," but Just the News' proprietor thinks that's coming very soon.
Surprising, but not surprising: it was a TEN-YEAR-LONG effort from the Deep State.
“People are starting to get grand jury subpoenas. I’ve been talking to defense lawyers and about 20 to 30 have gone out in the last couple of weeks. The big conspiracy is now being put together.”...
- Jack Smith’s top two deputies have pleaded the fifth amendment about what they did in this case, meaning they know they engaged in criminal activities because prosecutors don’t typically plead the 5th. “Stunning,” according to John....
- Not included in this clip is the part where he says the FBI dismantled the unit that worked on Arctic Frost and all those agents have been fired and are under investigation....
The FEEBS. Just Following Orders, ya'know.
6 comments:
It is not true that Jack Smith's top two deputies have broadly pleaded the Fifth Amendment about their conduct in the cases against President Trump.
One former top aide, Jay Bratt, invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination during a May 2025 appearance before the House Judiciary Committee, which is chaired by Rep. Jim Jordan.
Bratt's legal team stated he had "no choice but to invoke his fifth amendment rights" in response to the committee's inquiries, which stemmed from allegations of prosecutorial abuses related to the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case.
Other former top deputies, Molly Gaston and J.P. Cooney, left the Justice Department in early 2025 after President Trump's re-election and have since launched a private law firm. There are no reports of them pleading the Fifth Amendment.
Republicans on the House panel have generally accused Smith's former deputies of refusing to answer dozens of the committee's questions by citing strict grand jury secrecy rules, which government lawyers are prohibited from violating, rather than invoking the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, which is a different legal protection.
Jack Smith himself, through his lawyers, has expressed a desire to testify publicly before Congress to address "many mischaracterizations" of his investigations, and has asked the Justice Department for guidance on what he can and cannot discuss due to confidentiality rules and executive privilege.
I will wager that this will go nowhere, just like all of the other times "the big storm" fizzled out, once TACO Don and his caretakers realize that the other side gets to present evidence and cross examine witnesses.
Bet your HOUSE, Capper??
Yup
Better take a serious look at his WINNING record in the courts--circuit appeals and SCOTUS--before you get silly. He has not even "lost" the welfare/food stamps case, as he is perfectly willing to send money, whenever "the courts" figure out the legal way for him to do it.
As I said, lots of storm warnings, no actual storms. unless you count the shitstorms in his pants.
Post a Comment