Well, well, well.
To the surprise of no one at all, the Maricopa County "election" of 11/3 was largely fraudulent.
...An estimated 173,104 votes are missing or lost, as reported to our volunteers who went door to door verifying registration and voting information for thousands of residents. These are American citizens living in Maricopa County who cast a vote, primarily by mail, in the election and yet there is no record of their vote with the county and it was not counted in the reported vote totals for the election. Additionally an estimated 96,389 mail-in votes were cast under the names of registered voters who were either unknown to the residents of the registration address or who were verified as having moved away prior to October 2020. Other irregularities were uncovered during the canvass at a smaller scale, including votes cast by mail from vacant lots, votes recorded from residents who had not actually voted, etc....
That's from a report submitted NOT by the "CodeMonkeys" group which did the audit last month, but by another group which actually did a canvass.
And as all of us know, the canvass is what really counts.
6 comments:
I'm sorry Dad, but they took a sample of only 11,000 people out of a population of 4.3 million people. They are projecting a lot.
Maricopa is a large county, size wise and area size. The samples are miniscule if they counted in each ward of the county.
If they canvased a broad and diverse area of said county, then you can definitely extrapolate the results in a pretty accurate way. What they uncovered is very significant.
Yah....pollsters such as YouGov, Marquette, (et al) poll only about 1% of a field to come up with their numbers. Go to the link to find their methodology and the areas they covered.
Yeah, and you see how accurate most polls are.
And taking a survey of.02% or may .2%, is a long way off off of even 1%.
I wonder where they did their surveys. Just in Phoenix? Or did they go to Wickenburg, Cave Creek Surprise or Globe? Did they go into GOP strongholds?
I think the election was probably stolen, but this just a tiny piece of the puzzle. They have to present actual numbers, not projected numbers.
Mar....results are for MARICOPA COUNTY ONLY, not Gila
Also Mar: the scientifically-valid survey sample for Maricopa would be ~500 contacts. The canvass here was 5,000 contacts, 10X that number.
Post a Comment