How the Democrats Pulled It Off

Let's begin with an Inconvenient Truth:  Trump Won.

But the EC vote will be upheld and an Alzheimer's-enfeebled pretender will be President for a while.  Then the Democrat Party, already a symbol of corruption and Statism, will take out the pretender and install their preferred Statist.

But how did this happen?

Actually, it was pretty easy.  Note well:  Lott's analysis could easily demonstrate that the "suburban housewife abandons Trump" narrative in the Waukesha-Ozaukee-Washington counties is flat-out bullshit as I have suspected since the "polls" on the question began to surface early in 2020.

Here's RedState's Shipwreckedcrew on the matter.

...I want to distinguish the use of statistical data as evidence in a courtroom in an election challenge, and the use of such data as a general matter in other kinds of litigation.

In a typical election contest lawsuit brought by the losing candidate, that individual must come into Court with evidence showing the fraudulent process, and how many invalid votes were included as a result.  To overturn the outcome of the election requires the challenger to prove that a specific number of invalid votes were included in the reported results, and removing those invalid votes from the vote totals would change the outcome of the contest.

As we saw played out in a number of lawsuits filed in the aftermath of the election, the Trump campaign was not able to marshall that kind of specific, ballot-level evidentiary record to invalidate a discrete set of cast ballots that would reverse the numerical result. ...

The lawyer for Democrat Election Fraud--whose twit-apprentice serves his Party as WI AG--knew that, and over a period of several years, designed the Fraud's mechanism.

...The vote for President is unique because of the extraordinarily compressed timeframe regarding the vote of the Electoral College, making the procedural hurdles of a meaningful election contest insurmountable....

Was it actually Election Fraud?  No question about it!  Shipwrecked notes John Lott's statistical analysis of the Georgia and Pennsylvania frauds.

What Dr. Lott did instead was to look at precinct-level voting data for those precincts on the county’s borders, and compare the data to contiguous precincts in the next county over....

...One particular Fulton precinct shared a border with four precincts in Cherokee County, which was won by Trump roughly 70-30%....

...Dr. Lott looked at the 2016 election results by those 5 precincts and found the vote totals — both absentee and in-person — all showed a less than 1% difference in voter behavior.  This was true with regard to both absentee ballots and in-person voting.  The residents of these five precincts all behaved in statistically identical ways regardless of whether they were in Fulton or Cherokee Counties. ...

When Dr. Lott did the same analysis for 2020, he found significantly different results comparing one county to the other.  The in-person voting results were consistent with 2016, as the voting totals and results across the five precincts were nearly identical on a statistical basis.  It did not matter whether the in-person vote totals were in Fulton or Cherokee Counties across the five precincts, the outcomes were the same....

...But that was not true with regard to absentee ballots.  In 2020, Trump did nearly 7% worse in the absentee ballot vote total in the Fulton County precinct than he did in the four Cherokee County precincts.  Again, the analysis involves the same neighborhoods with no meaningful demographic differences — the only difference is the bisecting county line...

You see the Wisconsin comparison here?  Was there ANY meaningful look at the W-O-W counties' mail-in absentee voting?  Was there an audit?  Answer:  NO and NO.  The NeverTrump Pubbies, their allies in the Party's 'leadership' and the slimy-evasive Legislative leadership .........well.....what have you heard from them?

...Dr. Lott also looked at Allegheny County in Pennsylvania, which is surrounded on all sides by counties that voted for Pres. Trump, while Allegheny County was won by Joe Biden 60-39%.  Dr. Lott again focused on the precinct level voting patterns in precincts that shared county lines with precincts in the counties won by Pres. Trump.

He found a similar statistically significant reduction in Trump support between the precincts in Allegheny County and the neighboring precincts across four other county lines where the voters were in the same geographic neighborhood with matching demographics.  The difference was only about 1/2 of what he found in Fulton County, but it was present in all the examined precincts....

Game, set, match.

We don't think that the Democrat coup will be a peaceful one.  They deserve a bit of .......ahhh..........resistance........no?