What passes for "reporting" in the 25-y-o 'minds' at the Washington Post....
...The impact of cancellations in the small-group market is expected to be
less dramatic than in the individual market, partly because a higher
percentage of small-business policies provide more generous benefits.
Still, the changes being made by the insurance industry are leaving some
small-business owners confused and disillusioned about the law —
whether it is directly to blame for the changes or not....
"Changes being made"? Really? Forty percent premium increases and 'here's the bennie schedule, take it or leave it'? Those are "changes", alright.
The 'reporter' here transcribes, slobbering fluids all over the keyboard, what The Regime dictates (between heavy sighs...)
...But many are related only indirectly to the law; insurers are trying
to move customers to new plans designed to offset the financial and
administrative risks associated with the health-care overhaul. As part of that, they are consolidating their plan offerings to maximize profits and streamline how they manage them....
"Indirectly"? Insurers who are forced to LOSE money due to ObozoCare (that's a direct relationship) are scrambling to regain black ink before they go BK. Nothing "indirect" about that at all.
It's The Plan.
HT: AOSHQ
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
In my letter to the editor I am going to suggest that newspapers hire more keen witted 75 year olds like you to offset the age imbalance.
Post a Comment