It's a Ruling Class thing, ya' know.
...The federal government had told the judge it concluded that her recent ruling exempted only the named plaintiffs in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the provision
...The judge noted that the law doesn’t have a requirement that there be any knowledge that an act is prohibited before a detention. The judge also said the law is vague, and she appeared to be disturbed that the administration lawyers refused to answer her questions.
Given the trajectory outlined above, the Feds may well stuff that judge into prison first, before they frog-march the Catholic Bishops...