There are those who maintain that the Rule of Law is important.
Then there's the Attorney General of the State of Massachusetts:
Attorney General Martha Coakley said last night that if Massachusetts voters were to approve a ban on same-sex marriages, she would back any efforts to challenge the measure on constitutional grounds.
A constitutional ban could go on the ballot in November 2008 if it receives a second vote of approval from the Legislature.
Were Ripley still here!
The AG will sue on the basis that a CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT is un-Constitutional.
You can't make this stuff up!
HT: CourageMan
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I'll predict that if SCOUSA rules that state marriage amendments are constitutional, Coakley et al will respond by saying, "Justice Roberts has made his decision. Now let him enforce it." They'll even defy the Supreme Court...
Post a Comment