Since nobody is watching the J6 Committee hearings, they want to spice 'em up a bit.
...Costello told Just the News that the committee prefers to make a "television moment consistent with their narrative" rather than risk the surprises inherent in live testimony.
"They do not encourage live testimony," Costello said in a statement. "Bernie Kerik was given a conditional waiver of attorney client privilege by President Trump if Kerik would be allowed to testify publicly. The Select Committee declined. The reason they do this is to make a television moment consistent with their narrative. This is not an investigation, this is propaganda for political theatre."...
"Political theatre".
Lying. It's what Democrats do!!
Occam’s Razor is applied here—his need for several war rooms led by a slew of lawyers and assorted shady characters shows a coordinated effort to interfere with the election results. And when men such as John Eastman and Michael Flynn repeatedly plead the 5th in their depositions, what do they have to hide if their actions were legal as they claim?
ReplyDeleteIt’s ominous when a sitting President attempts a coup to keep himself in power.
In his testimony to the January 6 Commission, former Trump White House lawyer Eric Herschman said Sydney Powell told him that all of the 60-plus judges who threw out her lawsuits challenging the results of the 2020 election were corrupt.
So, prove her assertion.
In another deposition featuring former Attorney General Bill Barr, the former Trump official said that when asked by the former president if the Department of Justice should seize voting machines, he told Trump, “Absolutely not. There’s no probable cause.”
So, prove that Barr’s constitutional and legal rationale is wrong.
Even better yet, prove that Pat Cippollone and Cassidy Hutchinson are sitting members, at worst, or compromised assets, at best, of the Deep State.
You cite Hutchinson? Whose brother's cousin knows a guy who dated a secretary in the Secret Service' office, who heard from........
ReplyDeleteBarr's right: vote-control is a State matter. We already know--with certainty--that the Wisconsin Election Commission broke the law WRT procedures. Arizona's Maricopa County managed to come up with more voters than registrants, by a large enough margin to flip the election, and there's plenty of road still to travel in PA. and MI.--which is being obstructed by the all-Democrat ruling class.
As to the 'corrupt judges'--by simple odds, Powell's right about at least a few of them. What she DID say (prove otherwise) is that the system itself is corrupt in the sense that it is inadequate to deal with dishonesty by voting officials. And there is plenty of that, as 2000 Mules demonstrates beyond question.
"Assorted shady characters"........Because what? Democrat back-office lawyers are Mr. Clean and they're part of the Litany of Saints? Be serious, pal.
You should cite the exact passages in which the 5th was invoked. Indicting ham sandwiches is easy. There's plenty of space in this combox; use it. We all want to know all about it.
For fun: what does "Do you believe in a peaceful transition of power?" have to do with on-the-ground occurrences on J6?
ReplyDeleteSince Flynn's "beliefs" are totally irrelevant (he was out of Government for quite some time) to the facts on the ground, answering either way would result in rabbit-hole moral and/or legal questions.
In a deposition one is not allowed to respond "immaterial" so the obvious non-answer is 5th. The question(s) were designed for entrapment--typical slimeball lawyer crap--and the response they deserved was a good slap across Cheney's kisser.
Have a nice day.