As often as possible, the Democrats' scribbling stenographers tell you that claims of election fraud are "without evidence."
Claims such as:
...unconstitutional election law changes, a postal employee’s report of post-dating of invalid ballots by others at the US Postal Service, allegations of election machine internet capability and connectivity, reports of vote flipping by the election machines in Antrim County Michigan, reports of election workers passing the same batch of ballots through scanners multiple times, illegal transport of a truckload of ballots across state lines to Pennsylvania, abuse of poll watchers, reports of training videos for election workers to make them hostile and abusive to Republican poll watchers, cardboard installed to obstruct the view of poll watchers, declarations by candidates that people should move, temporarily, to states to vote, and so change, likely election results,...
Since sworn testimony and videotape actually ARE "evidences," there's a very good response to the liars:
NEVER DISPROVEN.
The evidence is in and corresponds exactly to what we all knew the day after the Fraud of '20: it was stolen.
Want to have fun? Ask around. See who actually admits to being one of the "81 million" who voted for Biden. Shouldn't be hard to find a few, given that number, right?
Heh.
Of course it's been disproven. Long ago. You're just too stubborn to admit it.
ReplyDeleteThese are FACTS.
Kellyanne Conway admitted that Trump lost the Election of 2020, and not due to malfeasance as alleged.
Arizona’s audit showed no widespread fraud in that states election for President, disproving Trump's claim.
Former Trump lawyer Sydney Powell claimed she had evidence that the U.S. Army seized servers in Germany that proved Trump votes were switched to Biden. She has yet to offer up that proof.
William Barr stated there were no legal grounds whatsoever for him to claim that there was systemic corruption in the U.S. electoral system. Barr said he told Trump it was “crazy.”
Jason Miller confessed that Trump was privately told—-by his own trusted data experts—-that he was going to lose the 2020 presidential election.
Three hand-picked Trump officials—Ben Ginsberg, Republican attorney and election expert, Chris Stirewalt, former Fox News political analyst, Bill Stepien, 2020 Trump campaign official—testified under oath to that effect. Remember, Trump from the get-go said that he would win re-election no matter what—if he won, there was no or limited fraud; if he lost, there was malfeasance of epic proportions. This behavior is exactly the sort of lifelong narcissist who could convince himself of something favorable to him that is delusional.
But Trump cannot claim “willful ignorance”; he cannot escape the establishment of criminal intent by deliberately keeping yourself ignorant of the truth of a given situation. The credible information Trump received from his hand-picked election team—the best advisers and data analysts money could buy—that a *reasonable person* in his position would trust directly told him he was going to lose and did lose. In response, Trump sought willful ignorance, and brought in Rudy Giuliani and Sydney Powell, two sycophants, to promote his “conspiracy”. We know Trump’s is clear: when he finds that someone is an obstacle to his schemes, he pushes them out, fires them, or seeks to intimidate them.
Two other advisors, Trump lawyer Eric Hershman, said he never saw evidence that the “Dominion conspiracy” was real, and Matt Morgan, Trump campaign lawyer, said he found no legal challenges would change the results (Marc Short/Greg Jacobs agreed). Again, Trump selected these men. And then top it off, Rudy was drunk when he pitched to Trump’s team just having Trump (falsely) declare victory. No one on Trump’s team—no one—made that suggestion they lacked the evidence to support a victory claim.
Stepien testified that from his standpoint Fox News had the best election-prediction mechanism of any network on Election Night and that he was extremely proud of FNC making the right call and making it first about Arizona. He also said that was no no credible evidence of problems in vote counts in Arizona. Even Jared Kushner stated that Trump should not to go down the route he did. William Barr confirmed that “I didn’t want to be a part of it [Rudy’s claims]”, as they were “bullshit” and are one reason he resigned.notes that Sidney Powell, when she was sued civilly for her absurd election-related claims, conceded (in writing) that no reasonable person could possibly have taken her post-election claims of election fraud as accurate. And yet, Trump unreasonably did.
I don't really care what K Conway has to say, and Bill Bluto Barr REFUSED TO LOOK at any of the legitimate issues raised; in fact, he told his USA in Pennsylvania to STOP looking at the allegations. Barr is a treasonous bastard and Trump should never have agreed to hire his ass.
ReplyDeleteDon't care what Powell had to say, either; I think her remarks (unlike those of Barr and Conway) were meant well, but she was hornswoggled by some digi-wonk who sold her a bill of goods.
if he lost, there was malfeasance of epic proportions
No. Only 6 States, and only reliably fraudulent Counties. Not "epic." Calculated, just like the Russian victory over the clown-prince in Ukraine.
Rudy was drunk
Eyewitnesses disagree with your slander.
Gee. Trump is a narcissist. So is EVERY OTHER POLITICIAN you can name. All are driven to win. Tell me something I don't know, friend.
Curious that you've avoided mention of The Movie and stayed with "experts" who chose to ignore the obvious statistical anomalies--such as Biden getting "81 million" votes when even Obama in all his Unicorn Pixie-Dust Glory couldn't pull more than 75 million.
Keep up the delusions in your head. As you know, the majority of voters think the '20 was stolen. That's because it was.
Just for shits and giggles, let's look again at Georgia.
ReplyDeletehttps://thefederalist.com/2022/06/17/jan-6-committee-ignores-clear-evidence-of-mass-illegal-voting-systematically-broken-election-laws/
Neither Margot Cleveland nor Cleta Mitchell is a nutbag; they weren't sold a bill of goods by a bits-and-bytes twit.
But unlike all the "experts" YOU cite, they actually bring law and evidence into play.
Suck on that, pal.
Davis was discredited.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.eacourier.com/copper_era/opinion/more-trump-election-distortions/article_efd7b85c-e839-11eb-a22b-335fabd54daf.html
And, of course, it does matter what former Trump officials said. He lost.