Got a Spare $33 BILLION for Corrupt Ukraine??

This is beyond parody, and it's likely to get approved by "military man" Scott Fitzgerald* and (R-Oshkosh Truck) Ron Johnson.

...During her press briefing Press Secretary Jen Psaki said the White House doesn’t want to “define what success in Ukraine looks like,” but demands U.S. taxpayers to give them another $33 billion toward it.

A few moments later Psaki admits the money will be spent subsidizing not only Ukraine, but NATO allies who are suffering the results of inflation.

Psaki stated the Biden demand for more money “is not all for Ukraine, it’s also for some of our Eastern European partners and others to help support them during this time as well.”  Wait, now we are paying to subsidize the economy of EU countries while our own economy is contracting?...

Fitzgerald recently sent another silly-assed email all in High Dudgeon that 'Putin doesn't like me'.

Awwwww.   Wah-wah-wah waaaaaahh.

So you know where "Mr. Military" is going to be putting his vote.  

We also have concerns about Ron Johnson; the Senate vote on a "Give Them Arms" bill was "voice" only--so who knows what RoJo did?

This is clear as crystal:  the military-industrial complex's sales/profit curve went *poof* when Biden gifted the Taliban with $8 billion in armaments and abandoned the 'stan, so they're pushing Biden to have another war (which to them means "party!!!")

And what's $33 BN?  Not all that much, ya'know.  Less than the college loan balances, ya'know.  FAR less than what the US will spend on its own bureaucrats, ya'know.  Just give it up for the cause, ya'know.

And some Congressmen will do exactly that.

*He was a Major in the Reserves.  "Major" is translated REMF, in case you don't know.