Friday, March 11, 2022

The Long-Term War in Ukraine

Sundance thinks that the US will be using Qatar as its arms-distribution outlet to support the "rebels" in Ukraine in their long-term war on Putin.

If that's true, the US has already given up the idea that Ukraine will repel Putin--or in the alternative, that they will come to an operative truce.

...The United States is putting Qatar back into the business of brokering arms sales from the U.S. government into Ukraine.  Following the geopolitical intervention models previously used in Egypt, Libya and Syria by President Obama and Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and Anthony Blinken are now repeating the process toward Ukraine.

In many ways this should not be a surprise.  Qatar is the financial hub and support network for the Muslim Brotherhood.  Qatar is also the arms broker for covert military operations when the U.S. does not want visible fingerprints.

By making this designation now, the Biden administration is setting up the groundwork for a long-term proxy war between the U.S/NATO and Russia in Ukraine....

But wait!!!  There's more!!!

...Ukraine is the new proxy war geography, replacing Libya

  • The key geopolitical alliance members on Team NATO will be the U.S., Canada, U.K, Turkey, Australia, New Zealand and Qatar
  • The key geopolitical alliance members on Team Putin will be Russia, China, Iran and Syria.

.

 Some RadioMouths will be ......challenged.....

 ...Support for new Biden alliance between The Brotherhood and NATO will be a little complex, as Iran is pro-brotherhood and also pro-Putin.

Additionally, Israel is a very tenuous pro-Biden, but definitely not pro-Brotherhood. Watch how Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro line up on this one with buckets of hypocrisy – supporting the Brotherhood against Putin, yet denouncing the Brotherhood overall....

So we are no longer allowed to condemn the Muslim Brotherhood?

This is so confusing, until you look at the effect on China.

 ...In order to maintain hegemony, the United States needs Russia to become a Western satellite before the petrodollar system collapses.

As long as Russia is a pro-Chinese authoritarian state, China can:
1) reliably get food, oil, and gas without needing to worry what the US thinks
2) focus all of its military might on population control (internal) and power projection (vs Taiwan, southeast Asia, and South China Sea) without worrying about its border with Russia
3) develop the Belt & Road initiative into Europe without worrying about Eurasian continental interference

These three factors, in turn, spell doom for the American hegemony. The first factor means that it can detach from the petrodollar, and therefore detach from SWIFT; the second factor means that it can be a one-front power rather than have to be a two-front power like the US, doubling its budget-per-theater; and the third factor means that it can neutralize America’s blue ocean sea power and thalassocracy.

It’s thus no surprise that the US has systematically and methodically worked towards turning the former USSR into a Western client. It has rolled EU and NATO membership eastward. When it has encountered resistance, it has staged color revolutions (twice, in Ukraine’s case). It applies sanctions, propaganda, and soft power. Since 2015 the CIA has been training anti-Russian insurgents.

Since I know this, we can safely assume that Russia knows this, too. Putin knows, for a fact, that his regime is the prime target of the West. Not because they are afraid of Russia, but because they are afraid of China. Controlling Russia is the method to keep China in check....

When you think about it, that means that China is not only a military-and-economic threat to the US/Global Hegemony.

It is also a cultural threat.

Hmmmmm.

4 comments:

  1. Tying Russia down in a long counterinsurgency is actually the best possible outcome from the US government's perspective. It's probably their actively-pursued end state; it might explain why they turned down the Polish MiGs for Ukraine, for example. If they could similarly tie down China, global leadership competition would be over for as long as the insurgencies last.

    ReplyDelete
  2. best possible outcome from the US government's perspective

    What about the US citizens? It's all very nice to ensure hegemony for such as the Senate, State Department, and the military-industrial complex.

    But there's no gain in this for lunchbox Joes and their families, is there?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Grim, did you see this? The Best possible outcome for the American people would be Nuremberg-style tribunal to prosecute & execute USA BIO-TERRORIST LIARS.

    U.N. Security Council Meeting on Ukraine
    The United Nations Security Council meets at Russia’s request to discuss claims of military biological activities by the USA in Ukraine. 2 hours

    https://www.c-span.org/video/?518615-1/un-security-council-meets-russian-claim-biolabs-ukraine

    Greg

    ReplyDelete
  4. Pentagon Bio-laboratories in Ukraine

    https://drjessesantiano.com/pentagon-bio-laboratories-in-ukraine/

    ReplyDelete