Friday, September 24, 2021

CDC: "To Hell With the Science!!"

This will shock you.

NOT.

...hours after the [CDC advisory] panel voted 9-6 not to recommend boosters for those groups, Walensky overruled them.
 

"As CDC Director, it is my job to recognize where our actions can have the greatest impact," Walensky said in a statement late Thursday, according to The Associated Press.

"At CDC, we are tasked with analyzing complex, often imperfect data to make concrete recommendations that optimize health."

“In a pandemic, even with uncertainty, we must take actions that we anticipate will do the greatest good,” she said in a statement.


“I believe we can best serve the nation’s public health needs by providing booster doses for the elderly, those in long-term care facilities, people with underlying medical conditions, and for adults at high risk of disease from occupational and institutional exposures to COVID-19,” she added....

Naturally, Walensky, having 'analyzed complex and often imperfect data', made a recommendation which was Jell-O, not 'concrete.'  Did she offer a definition of  'occupational/institutional exposure'?  Nope. 

Half of the game Democrats play is never defining the terms.  The other half is lying all the time.

No comments:

Post a Comment