Wisconsin native.
"The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him."--GKC
"Liberalism is the modern and morbid habit of always sacrificing the normal to the abnormal" --G K Chesterton
"The only objective of Liberty is Life" --G K Chesterton
"A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition." -- Rudyard Kipling
Sunday, November 29, 2020
Need Evidence??
A pal sent over the link to an evidence-aggregation website. This is exactly what Teddy Perry needs but will never, ever, peruse. Ever.
It's interesting, and takes a bit of time to load.
It is a news report about a woman who was concerned about “ballot envelopes visibly identify the voter’s party affiliation”. Except it is a code to make sure the people get their ballots for the proper primary according to Florida State Law. There was no proof here that the ballots themselves were compromised or discarded by election officials. In other words, it is “suggested” that “possibly” there was some sort of malfeasance. So, while a concern about this labeling is legitimate, it does NOT constitute evidence in a court of law of voter suppression, tampering, or removal.
It is an affidavit. The person says “I directly observed, on a daily basis, City of Detroit election workers and employees coaching and trying to coach voters to vote for Joe Biden and the Democrat party. I witnessed these workers and employees encouraging voters to do a straight Democrat ballot. I witnessed these election workers and employees going over to the voting booths with voters in order to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote.”
This individual has made an accusation. That is NOT evidence. Had this person supplied audio or video recordings, then that would be proof. So, this person would be subject to cross examination in a court of law to determine her credibility.
There are dozens of similar instances by which a person says that they saw something illegal. But the collection of these examples does not mean without question that voter fraud occurred. Rather, these cases have to go before a court of law to determine if the claims can be clearly substantiated by other people who witnessed the same thing and/or physical evidence. So in the case of this person, what other co-workers witnessed it? These allegations have to be substance, not style.
You are being duped once again.
ReplyDeleteHere is one source found there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyrCLH8YtzI&feature=emb_title
It is a news report about a woman who was concerned about “ballot envelopes visibly identify the voter’s party affiliation”. Except it is a code to make sure the people get their ballots for the proper primary according to Florida State Law. There was no proof here that the ballots themselves were compromised or discarded by election officials. In other words, it is “suggested” that “possibly” there was some sort of malfeasance. So, while a concern about this labeling is legitimate, it does NOT constitute evidence in a court of law of voter suppression, tampering, or removal.
Here is another source.
https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2020-11/JessyJacobAffidavit.pdf
It is an affidavit. The person says “I directly observed, on a daily basis, City of Detroit election workers and employees coaching and trying to coach voters to vote for Joe Biden and the Democrat party. I witnessed these workers and employees encouraging voters to do a straight Democrat ballot. I witnessed these election workers and employees going over to the voting booths with voters in order to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote.”
This individual has made an accusation. That is NOT evidence. Had this person supplied audio or video recordings, then that would be proof. So, this person would be subject to cross examination in a court of law to determine her credibility.
There are dozens of similar instances by which a person says that they saw something illegal. But the collection of these examples does not mean without question that voter fraud occurred. Rather, these cases have to go before a court of law to determine if the claims can be clearly substantiated by other people who witnessed the same thing and/or physical evidence. So in the case of this person, what other co-workers witnessed it? These allegations have to be substance, not style.