There is one local RadioMouth (Hint: early mornings on 1130) who should read this, but he's so far up the nethers of the Chamber of Commerce that it won't make any difference at all.
...Marx believed that international free trade, or perhaps more accurately, Ricardian economic globalization,
would pave the way for a glorious proletarian revolution. Specifically,
Marx thought that free trade would increase wealth inequality and
reduce wages for the majority of people, and that this tension
inevitably would lead to conflict.
While I hate to admit it, Marx is
broadly right on this point. International free trade has indeed
increased wealth inequality and reduced wages for the majority of
Americans. In fact, the median American household was richer in the 1980s than today
(better technology aside). Part of this is explained by the recent
influx of low-wage immigrants and decreasing household sizes—but even
so, globalization remains the single largest contributing factor.
Likewise, Marx was correct that
increasing inequality degrades social cohesion, setting the stage for
violence and revolution. As it turns out, people are not hyper-rational automatons like economists assume: jealousy is real, and most people would rather lose money than see someone else get rich relative to them, even if they would themselves get (slightly) richer....
Karl Marx, the US Chamber of Commerce, and ......Ben Shapiro.
No comments:
Post a Comment