Vox comments on the 5-on-2 attack of the other night. You'll figure out his use of the term "vibrants" unless you live under a rock.
...This is why you must carry. If both those victims had had compact
.357s, there would be five fewer predators out there looking for kicks
through beating up white people. Remember, vibrants never fight fair, so
you always have to be prepared to deal with at least three of them at a
time, and four is the safer assumption. Or, as in this case, five.
If you're armed, it's actually better if there is more than one attacker
because it's that much less likely that the pro-diversity crowd will
try to concoct a case against you. Just don't pull a Bernie Goetz and
shoot anyone in the back or when they're already down.
Even if you can't carry a gun for some reason, a serrated three-inch
blade on your keychain will be enough to address the first attacker. Get
the blade out, keep your hand out of sight as the first attacker comes
in, stay low, drive in with your left shoulder, rear hand in and up, and
the attacker should be out of commission before he even knows you're
armed. Don't try to warn them off, because when outnumbered you want
surprise on your side. Vibrants tend to be cowardly, as you can see by
the way they dart in and out when they attack, so they're probably not
going to stick around after the first guy goes down. But don't pause and
wait for them to run off, move in and take out the second one as soon
as the first one is incapacitated....
Good stuff.
No comments:
Post a Comment