That's the word, folks.
Word.
"Irrelevant."
Law is 'irrelevant.' Ethics are 'irrelevant.' US citizens/victims of AlQuaeda are 'irrelevant.' Who actually sent arms to the Sinaloa Cartel? "Irrelevant."
If only Obozo were "irrelevant" like he was in the Illinois legislature and the US Senate.
Barack Obama was certainly relevant in the Illinois legislature as a leader, active and productive.
ReplyDeleteThe same goes for his time in the US Senate.
Yah. He led the "Present" Party.
ReplyDeleteAnyone who is not ignorant knows that voting "present" in the Illinois legislature was a common procedural tactic. His vote on the so-called "live birth" law was in response to the unwanted restrictions on abortion access within a bill that duplicated existing protections for live births.
ReplyDeleteIf you weren't ignorant you would know that?
...irrelevant at Harvard,
ReplyDeleteirrelevant as the appointed-by-his-sponser-family stooge editor at HarLawRev,
irrelevant at U of Chicago before he was forced to relinquish his law license under threat of it being taken away from him just like his corrupt wife lost her law license for being part of, can you believe it, a Chicago gov't. corruption scandal,
etc.,
etc.,
etc.
Constitutional law professor? Try hated and despised incompetent irrelevant adjunct fill-in lecturer. Present professor got diarrhea? Call in Barry OSubby.
OFucker's one relevancy? Lying his black jigaboo ass off.
This is one psychotic sociopathic CFR manchurian candidate.
Shadow government marionette puppeteer CFR'er Zbigniew Brzezinski really screwed up on this black robot.
Barry Soetoro...paint him black and call him a complete and utter failure.
Oh, wait...he is black. O.K., color him Kenyan...
This excrement stands on your blog, Dad?
ReplyDeleteThe Saint is to Dad as Billy Carter was to Jimmy.
ReplyDeleteTO: AnnBile
ReplyDelete5/19/2013 8:33 PM
5/19/2013 8:36 PM
...aaawwwww...
...not PC enough for the liberal sodomy you try and pass off as blogging, you turd of an excuse?!
I agree @8:33. Why does Dad29 allow Jim to post here?
ReplyDeleteLooks like we have two charlatans--St. Revolution and some juvenile imposter who claims to be The Joker, THE Joker, or The Real Joker whenever the original one of those identities makes a statement.
ReplyDeleteI know. It's disgusting a cryptofascist like Dad29 lets this crap go on. It really shows what a terrible Catholic he is.
ReplyDeleteWhy should Dad censor this blog? Thought y'all were big supporters of the Constitution - does the Bill of Rights not count? You know, the First Amendment is there not to protect POPULAR speech. Sorry you don't like what some of the dweebs are saying, and it is disgustingly hateful, but - there's that pesky amendment thing.
ReplyDeleteTim is obliquely making another point: it's useful to know what others REALLY think.
ReplyDeleteGenerally speaking I try to keep the combox fairly clean.
To that end: TONE IT DOWN, StR.
It doesn't excuse you from policing your blog. It violates the Blogspot Terms of Service.
ReplyDeleteI'm sure you were asleep in Mass when they talked about responsibilities.
Oops, there I go again impersonating. Sorry.
ReplyDeleteSincerely, Mr. J. Paw Lak
Seriously, Dad29. Police your blog already. Now you have the anony zip at 11:34 trying to impersonate two people at once.
ReplyDeleteSorry, Dad29, I suffer from schizophrenia.
ReplyDeleteAnd you're a real asshole, Dad29 for letting some jerk just steal my identity.
ReplyDeleteI, 10:45 p.m., am the jerk.
ReplyDeleteWell then, just jot down your address and we'll someone over to satisfy your urge.
ReplyDelete