Just a couple of points here, relayed by Malkin.
This concerns the Senate proposal, not whatever-it-is that Ryan and the terrorist-lover from Chicago spew onto the table.
...The background check
provisions of the bill in Section 2101(b)(8) contain no requirement
that amnesty applicants actually provide government-issued documentation
proving who they say they are. That means that any illegal alien can
invent a new name with a totally clean record and present that name when
applying for the amnesty. Immigration officials will have absolutely
no way to force the alien to disclose his real identity....
... Unlike the amnesty of 1986, and unlike the various smaller amnesties
that have been enacted since then (such as the “Section 245i” amnesty),
this bill actually allows illegal aliens who have already been deported
from the United States to return and gain the amnesty.....
...Sections 2101(b)(13 and 2103(b)(2)(C) permits beneficiaries of Secretary
Napolitano’s unlawful DACA directive of June 2012 to become eligible
for the amnesty and for lawful permanent resident status. The DACA
Directive was issued by Secretary Napolitano in direct violation of
federal law, specifically 8 U.S.C. § 1225, which requires that
immigration officials place certain aliens into removal proceedings....
The Administration of Lawlessness (Obozo & Co.) rolls on, aided and abetted by Congress.
Malkin was naturalized during the Reagan amnesty...she got hers, so screw the rest of 'em.
ReplyDeleteMalkin is an anchor baby, so she has NO credibility on this topic.
ReplyDeleteFail.
ReplyDelete1) Her status--whatever it is--has no impact on truth or falsehood. It is, or it ain't, true, no matter who says it.
2) The quoted text is NOT Malkin's, dumbass. Check the link.
I'm not talking about the quoted text, I'm talking about her status, which has EVERYTHING to do with her current position on immigration, which is irony personified.
ReplyDeleteShe was the product of immigrants...yet now touts they should NOT gain access to America. Her parents came to the U.S. on a worker sponsored visa. She was born an automatic American citizen to non-citizen migrant workers, and now she opposes this opportunity.
Does she want to revoke her own citizenship? Does she want to deport herself? Did her parents "game the system" like she accuses thousands of immigrant parents of American citizens who are NOT her parents?
If we start deporting illegals, Malkin should be on the first boat out.
ReplyDelete