McArdle wrote an interesting piece.
...many of the mandarins have never worked for a business at all, except
for a think tank, the government, a media organization, or a
school—places that more or less deliberately shield their content
producers from the money side of things. There is nothing wrong with any
of these places, but culturally and operationally they're very
different from pretty much any other sort of institution. I don't myself
claim to understand how most businesses work, but having switched from
business to media, I'm aware of how different they can be.
In fact, I think that to some extent, the current political wars are a
culture war not between social liberals and social conservatives, but
between the values of the mandarin system and the values of those who
compete in the very different culture of ordinary businesses--ones
outside glamour industries like tech or design.
...The road to a job as a public
intellectual now increasingly runs through a few elite schools, often
followed by a series of very-low-paid internships that have to be
subsidized by well-heeled parents, or at least a free bedroom in a major
city. The fact that I have a somewhat meandering work and school
history, and didn't become a journalist until I was 30, gives me some
insight (she said, modestly) that is hard to get if you’re on a
laser-focused track that shoots you out of third grade and straight
toward a career where you write and think for a living. Almost none of
the kids I meet in Washington these days even had boring menial
high-school jobs working in a drugstore or waiting tables; they were
doing “enriching” internships or academic programs. And thus the
separation of the mandarin class grows ever more complete.
I’m
hinting at the final problem, which is that this ostensibly
meritocratic system increasingly selects from those with enough wealth
and connections to first, understand the system, and second, prepare the
right credentials to enter it—as I believe it also did in Imperial
China.
You'll have to read the essay to know who 'the mandarins' are now.
It is a puzzlement. There's no question that meritocracy has its raison d'etre. The question is 'what is merit?'
HT: AOSHQ
No comments:
Post a Comment