Wisconsin native.
"The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him."--GKC
"Liberalism is the modern and morbid habit of always sacrificing the normal to the abnormal" --G K Chesterton
"The only objective of Liberty is Life" --G K Chesterton
"A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition." -- Rudyard Kipling
Friday, January 04, 2013
Some Animals Are More Equal
Feinstein explains why SHE is entitled to self-defense.
Sen. Feinstein was a target of violence and had specific threats on her life. Furthermore, I'm fairly certain that the concealed weapon that she carried was not a Bushmaster .223. There is nothing the lease bit hyprocritical on Feinstein's part.
Others are 'threatened,' too--and some are not YET 'threatened.'
As to the .223: how one chooses to defend one's family is up to them. As most fools know (but you don't) the "one-shot-one-kill" crap is only true on TV.
Who are you quoting? Certainly not me because that's not what I wrote.
The point of Dad's post is that Feinstein is somehow a hypocrite. My point is that she is not. She has been a sponsor of the anti-assault weapon ban, not against concealed carry.
No, the subject of the post is hypocrisy: that is, D. Feinstein.
Feinstein’s list of nearly 1,000 firearms exempted by name (see next paragraph) contains not a single handgun. Sen. Feinstein advocated banning handguns before being elected to the Senate, though she carried a handgun for her own personal protection.
Mark Levin is an idiot.
ReplyDeleteSen. Feinstein was a target of violence and had specific threats on her life. Furthermore, I'm fairly certain that the concealed weapon that she carried was not a Bushmaster .223. There is nothing the lease bit hyprocritical on Feinstein's part.
"She was threatened"
ReplyDeleteSo what?
Others are 'threatened,' too--and some are not YET 'threatened.'
As to the .223: how one chooses to defend one's family is up to them. As most fools know (but you don't) the "one-shot-one-kill" crap is only true on TV.
Talk about idiots....
Who are you quoting? Certainly not me because that's not what I wrote.
ReplyDeleteThe point of Dad's post is that Feinstein is somehow a hypocrite. My point is that she is not. She has been a sponsor of the anti-assault weapon ban, not against concealed carry.
Talk about clueless...
1) Feinie's new bill will register and restrict ANY semi-auto, handgun or long. She will also restrict mags for both.
ReplyDelete2) She is NOT against 'assault weapons'--at least under the definition thereof provided by the US military.
She just doesn't like semiauto rifles that look deadly.
Maybe you can't read--which would be a good excuse for your ignorance.
Apparently you can't read. The subject of this post is hypocrisy.
ReplyDeleteAs to 1) I'm fine with that but it's not relevant to the subject.
As to 2) It really doesn't matter what the military calls it. They call it 1400; I call it 2:00pm.
No, the subject of the post is hypocrisy: that is, D. Feinstein.
ReplyDeleteFeinstein’s list of nearly 1,000 firearms exempted by name (see next paragraph) contains not a single handgun. Sen. Feinstein advocated banning handguns before being elected to the Senate, though she carried a handgun for her own personal protection.
NRA/ILA http://www.nraila.org/legislation/federal-legislation/2012/feinstein-goes-for-broke-with-new-gun-ban-bill.aspx
It also seems that your ignorance is willful. What the military calls various boomsticks IS very germane to the discussion.
But then, one can hardly have a 'discussion' with an ignorant wanker who will not learn.
Feinstein's a lying liberal hypocrite who thinks she is more important than the little people she takes her money from.
ReplyDeleteIf you can't see this you must be one of her clueless liberal fans who think the same way.
Sure, because everyone but you is a moron. Or have I got that backwards?
ReplyDeleteYou missed the point entirely Feinstein fan.
ReplyDelete