The newsies can't get enough of this "poll" stuff. To normal people, it's almost as bad as the zillion-and-fifty flyers and phone calls. So this is my first, last, and only post about polls.
Both McCain and Vox happen to agree with Silver on this small statement:
My argument, rather, is this: we’ve about reached the point where if
Mr. Romney wins, it can only be because the polls have been biased
against him.
McCain on a poll in Ohio (leading off with Ed Morrissey's statement):
“all you need to know is this: the D/R/I is 38/29/32. In 2008, the
exit polls showed a split of 39/31/30, and in 2010 36/37/28.”
Stop
for a second and think about that: What this poll is telling us is that
partisan ID has shifted 2 points toward Democrats since 2008, which was
the best year for Democrats since LBJ won a landslide in ’64.
Vox: ...If Romney does win, the only possible conclusion is that the state polls must be biased....
An 2008-like (D) affiliation? Puhleeeeeeze.
No comments:
Post a Comment