If Romney only knew the history of Afghanistan....
...Romney also said he might not be so quick to
pull troops out of the unpopular war in Afghanistan. Obama has pledged
to end the U.S. combat role in Afghanistan by the end of 2014 as part of
NATO's plan to hand over security responsibility to Afghan forces.
Romney
said he would pursue a transition to Afghan security forces by that
time but would evaluate conditions there before making a final decision
to pull out.
Sorry, folks, that's just moronic. You could ask the (former) USSR, the last superpower to attempt 'taming' those guys.
...Romney pledged that his administration would work
to find elements of the Syrian opposition who share U.S. values and
ensure they obtain weapons needed to defeat President Bashir al-Assad's
forces.
Really? Western-valued Syrians? That would mean people of the Judaeo-Christian persuasion, right? Are there three of them in Syria?
It's a given that Obozo's foreign "policy" is ass-over-teakettle akimbo no-plan/no-how/no-where.
But Wilsonianism? Even worse.
Sounds like a neocon.
ReplyDeleteUh, yeah!? Have you read his list of foreign policy advisers? Reads like a roll call for the Iraq invasion cheerleader squad.
ReplyDeleteA neocon and a RINO. Thanks for voting for Romney, everyone! Good night...
ReplyDelete