"Survey Says"......Santorum WON Iowa?
Well, here's a
fine kettle of fish.
...
But what if Romney did not actually win Iowa? That could change the calculation considerably. And there is a very real chance that the Republican Party of Iowa will announce this week that Rick Santorum, and not Romney, won the Iowa caucuses.
...One campaign source says the vote count as of midday Monday showed Santorum ahead by 80-something votes. If that number holds through certification of the last precincts, Santorum will win. Of course, there is always the possibility that some of the final precincts will contain discrepancies that put Romney back on top. It's just not clear.
Heh.
This possibility has been causing plenty of agita with the Iowa GOP establishment. It will be interesting to see how it plays out.
ReplyDeleteDoes not matter, He has an "intrinsic evil" problem...
ReplyDeleteRead:
Santorum Voted to Subsidize Abortion, Planned Parenthood
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/10549-santorum-voted-to-subsidize-abortion-planned-parenthood
Paul places earmarks into the budgets, then votes against the budgets when he knows they'll pass.
ReplyDeleteHe's as phony as a three-dollar bill.
Since BabyKillers, Inc. has been funded by the Feds for more than 40 years, Santorum's votes are irrelevant.
But he doesn't EARMARK the money, unlike Paul, the lying twit.
It doesn't matter. They are getting an equal share of the electors out of Iowa.
ReplyDeleteWhy Pro-life, Pro-torture Cafeteria Catholic Politician Rick Santorum is not fit for office.
ReplyDeleteYou see Mr Santorum backed Pittsburgh stadium tax hike, which failed. Ahh, too bad Rick!
Of course after it failed, Did Ricky accept the decision of the voter? Of course not!
Not STUPID Voters!
SoTricky Ricky Santorum then backed ‘97 sales-tax vote in the legislature which passed and stuck
it to the tax-payer with a promise to repay .... Has it been repaid? Of course never been repaid.
Now Dad, please tell me how this behavior bodes for the future behavior of a President Santorum??
Please Read:
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jan/8/santorum-backed-pittsburgh-stadium-tax-hike/
Dad29, I suppose now that your on your buddy, Tricky Ricky Santorum's bandwagon,
your rants against stadium tax hikes for the benefit of private owners will have to stop?
Do you mind appearing the political prostitute?
Maybe its best that you delete these past rants against Milwaukee Stadium tax hikes
since your unprincipled support of Santorum in this light his position on Stadium
tax hikes is not a good thing.
Please Read:
http://dad29.blogspot.com/search?q=stadium+tax+
1. Strip-Club Is "Stimulus," Right?
2. Was Petak the Canary in the TEA Party Mine?
3 Hey, Tim! It's the SPENDING!
4. Can You Say "Forever"?
5. Stadium Tax Barometer Sticking It To 'Em!!
Ron Paul has made a good defense of his use of earmarks: The people of Texas have paid a ton of money in federal taxes, like people of all states. Texans have a right then to see the money they have paid to the federal government actually put to use in projects that benefit Texas.
ReplyDeleteI like that that you say {as|like} my friend thanks
ReplyDelete