Wisconsin native.
"The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him."--GKC
"Liberalism is the modern and morbid habit of always sacrificing the normal to the abnormal" --G K Chesterton
"The only objective of Liberty is Life" --G K Chesterton
"A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition." -- Rudyard Kipling
Well, she could be aiming it at those who voted in 2008 but are saying they are sitting this one out. But given she is from Chicago the home of "Vote Early - Vote Often" . . . .
Seriously neomom? How about: http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/103398539.html or http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/89947157.html or http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/104816414.html
Yes, I know, I know. These are all just activities to "ensure the validity" of the vote. If I can be open and say higher turnout benefits the Ds, why cannot you admit lower turnout benefits the Rs? Is it that the means justified to bring about those ends are a little bit more noble for my side?
ALLEGATIONS of 'caging' do not constitute 'caging.'
As Esenberg remarked, not only is 'caging' NOT a legal term--meaning that it is not prosecutable--it's also not "caging" when mailings are made and the results are turned over to civil authorities for their examination.
Let's face it: there will be a very low turnout of (D)-inclined voters. No big deal; happens a lot.
I did the math, it comes out Chicago + Democrat + Desperate = WINNER!!!
"ALLEGATIONS of 'caging' do not constitute 'caging.'"
For a man who makes a living accusing Democrats/liberals of all sorts of things--some legitimate and some illegitimate--with scant evidence and manachial hyperbole, please, spare us the b.s.
Well, she could be aiming it at those who voted in 2008 but are saying they are sitting this one out. But given she is from Chicago the home of "Vote Early - Vote Often" . . . .
ReplyDeleteYou honestly cannot think of another way? I disagree with almost everything you write, but I have never before considered you downright dense.
ReplyDeleteChicago + Democrat + Desperate.
ReplyDeleteDo the math, Jim.
Apparently, Al and JS, our friends do not understand voter suppression, the favorite election activity of the right.
ReplyDeleteVoter suppression on the right? Seriously.
ReplyDeleteName one in Wisconsin in the past 30 years. I dare you.
Seriously neomom? How about:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/103398539.html
or
http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/89947157.html
or
http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/104816414.html
Yes, I know, I know. These are all just activities to "ensure the validity" of the vote. If I can be open and say higher turnout benefits the Ds, why cannot you admit lower turnout benefits the Rs? Is it that the means justified to bring about those ends are a little bit more noble for my side?
ALLEGATIONS of 'caging' do not constitute 'caging.'
ReplyDeleteAs Esenberg remarked, not only is 'caging' NOT a legal term--meaning that it is not prosecutable--it's also not "caging" when mailings are made and the results are turned over to civil authorities for their examination.
Let's face it: there will be a very low turnout of (D)-inclined voters. No big deal; happens a lot.
I did the math, it comes out Chicago + Democrat + Desperate = WINNER!!!
ReplyDelete"ALLEGATIONS of 'caging' do not constitute 'caging.'"
For a man who makes a living accusing Democrats/liberals of all sorts of things--some legitimate and some illegitimate--with scant evidence and manachial hyperbole, please, spare us the b.s.