From Counterterrorism Blog's Walid Phares:
The big picture is obvious. The current conflict is not really about the classic Arab-Israeli process, which can resume between Israel, the Palestinian Authority and the Arab League anytime it is not obstructed. The Gaza fight is about Iran’s confrontation with Israel, and perhaps with the U.S. globally. A global strategic reading leads us to conclude that — just as we saw in Lebanon in 2006 -Tehran is pulling the strings and very smartly. Timing the Hamas end to the cease fire between two American presidencies in Washington and just before the Israeli and Palestinian elections, the Mullahs thought they would drag Israel into the Gaza battle on an Iranian timetable, triggering a “street” show of anger, boosted by the jihadi propaganda machine in the region with all the usual ramifications in the West. The astute Iranian move is to drag Israel enough into Gaza’s mud to indict it internationally so that any future Israeli strikes at Iran’s nuclear program will be seen as catastrophic. Tehran is calculating the minutia hoping Hamas will win at the end of the day, and that the Obama administration will begin its “talks” with Iran from an inferior position (since Israel will be blamed for the violence not the jihadists in Gaza). But the game has lots of risks, including the possibility that Hamas may lose its ability to be a military event maker after this campaign is over.
Phares mentions the notable reluctance of Egypt, the UAR, and Saudi Arabia to pitch in with the Hamas, and makes it very clear that the Palestinian Authority group is still in a civil war with Hamas over control of non-Israeli Palestine.
What a mess.
It IS a mess. And historically, we've seen that any time Israel agrees to a cease-fire, it just allows the other side to regroup. They'd be stupid to discontinue the fight before Hamas is wiped out. But the UN wouldn't like that much.
ReplyDeleteYeah...what a mess.
Unfortunately, a lot of people still think you can reason with unreasonable people. It won't work.
ReplyDelete