tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post48863822861409815..comments2024-03-28T09:54:55.115-05:00Comments on Dad29: Think You're in Hell Now? Wait a YearDad29http://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-23300718655784207462012-08-20T16:02:15.763-05:002012-08-20T16:02:15.763-05:00The "Cameron Gulbransen Kids Transportation S...The "<a href="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-110publ189/pdf/PLAW-110publ189.pdf" rel="nofollow">Cameron Gulbransen Kids Transportation Safety Act of 2007</a>" [H.R. 1216], dick.Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10004209843701697773noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-85051431241316880162012-08-19T23:03:40.742-05:002012-08-19T23:03:40.742-05:00Name the law, dipshit.Name the law, dipshit.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-47629970424654257142012-08-19T22:56:20.346-05:002012-08-19T22:56:20.346-05:00I know that's over your head....
Actually not...<i>I know that's over your head....</i><br /><br />Actually not over my head. Too complex for you to understand. Law says 1) cars and trucks will be equipped with rear view cameras by given date and 2) DOT will create specific rules by which this <i>LAW</i> will be carried out by given date. You know, like camera field of vision, size of dash display, allowable time lag for image to appear, placement of dash display, etc.<br /><br />I know that's over your head....Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10004209843701697773noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-88546833650604568692012-08-19T19:06:11.329-05:002012-08-19T19:06:11.329-05:00the rule is being issued as required by a law sign...<i>the rule is being issued as required by a law signed by George W. Bush</i><br /><br />Wrong decision by Bush (one of MANY), and "regulation" is not the same as "law."<br /><br />I know that's over your head....Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-39763404386170418442012-08-19T17:10:35.184-05:002012-08-19T17:10:35.184-05:00No, it's not "standard" equipment. ...No, it's not "standard" equipment. I happen to be very knowledgeable about this: you want it, you PAY for it as an option.<br /><br />And "saving 110 lives" is--as usual--a guess.Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-11210949123440314092012-08-19T07:59:51.793-05:002012-08-19T07:59:51.793-05:00Jim is taking Joshes place today, and look, he is ...Jim is taking Joshes place today, and look, he is quoting his favorite liberal rag, The Hells Bible!<br /><br />Fresh Distortions From The Left? <br /><br />Smells like more DNC shit to me.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-45878384490902035192012-08-18T22:53:32.921-05:002012-08-18T22:53:32.921-05:00Actually according the the New York Times the cost...Actually according the the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/29/business/rule-on-rearview-cameras-for-cars-is-delayed-for-review.html" rel="nofollow">New York Times</a> the cost will be about $200 and is already standard equipment on 45% of the current year's model. It is estimated the feature will save about 110 lives each year. And somebody's got to make them, so more jobs.<br /><br />BTW, the rule is being issued as required by a law signed by George W. Bush in 2008.Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10004209843701697773noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-45678523530908933792012-08-18T20:39:42.665-05:002012-08-18T20:39:42.665-05:00Where's that little fuckwit Josh Strupp to tel...Where's that little fuckwit Josh Strupp to tell us that regulations don't cost anything?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com