tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post485639211143170542..comments2024-03-29T08:47:16.366-05:00Comments on Dad29: IRS' Filthy, Repulsive, Lerner-LaundryDad29http://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-57274624051637655692014-09-24T20:03:10.153-05:002014-09-24T20:03:10.153-05:00Yah, and I'll guess that "limiting" ...Yah, and I'll guess that "limiting" Gummint ain't part of Obozo's agenda.<br /><br />And 2011.....lemmeeseeheah, Anony, wasn't that a year that our WannaBeeCrownPrince was in office?<br /><br />Yah. So your comment is nice, and absolutely meaningless.Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-59748582762002947972014-09-24T15:05:46.782-05:002014-09-24T15:05:46.782-05:00Your "quote" and the linked page it came...Your "quote" and the linked page it came from forgot to include the entire text of the item in question:<br /><br />"Criteria changed to 'Political action type organizations involved in <br />limiting/expanding government, educating on the constitution and bill of rights, social economic reform/movement' based on Determinations Unit concerns that the July 2011 criteria was too generic."<br /><br />I'm guessing that expanding government and social economic reform/movement are NOT conservative concerns. Also the criteria were changed from existing criteria in 2011, which coincidentally was the year BEFORE the presidential election.<br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com