tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post4484495357997428972..comments2024-03-28T03:14:51.294-05:00Comments on Dad29: Cdl Mahony v. ArizonaDad29http://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-16321512970126569422010-04-26T01:26:27.742-05:002010-04-26T01:26:27.742-05:00I would suggest that Nahony read what the Catholic...I would suggest that Nahony read what the Catholic Church actually teaches about immigration, not the USCCB documents that at time contradict that teaching.<br /><br />"The more prosperous nations are obliged, to the extent they are able, to welcome the foreigner in search of the security and the means of livelihood which he cannot find in his country of origin. . . . Political authorities, for the sake of the common good for which they are responsible, may make the exercise of the right to immigrate subject to various juridical conditions, especially with regard to the immigrants' duties toward their country of adoption. Immigrants are obliged to respect with gratitude the material and spiritual heritage of the country that receives them, to obey its laws and to assist in carrying civic burdens. " Par 2241<br /><br />If Mahony had his way he would do away will all laws & allow absolute chaos, something that the Church's teaching clearly forbids.<br /><br />But since when has Mahony actually cared about what the Church actually teaches?Alhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07721319432213055605noreply@blogger.com